My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02988
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2900
>
pf_02988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:28:06 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:57:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2988
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Implementation of the previous funding recommendations would result in the availability <br />of PIP funds for their intended use in 1999 and subsequent years. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDA TIONS: The PIP budget should be increased in proportion to <br />increases in park land and facilities. <br /> <br />Operating and maintenance budgets should not be used for new park <br />development. <br /> <br />Staffing and Maintenance <br />BACKGROUND: The amount currently allocated to the Parks and Recreation <br />Department budget is not adequate to maintain present parks and facilities to a high <br />standard. Recent and recommended acquisitions will increase park acreage by <br />approximately 25%. Construction of new recreational facilities will increase the need for <br />maintenance and for staff to supervise scheduling and programs. Significantly more <br />funds are needed to maintain the increased number of parks and recreational facilities <br />to the high standards expected by our community. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDA TlONS: The current operating budget of the Parks and Recreation <br />Department should be increased to provide adequate staffing and equipment to <br />maintain present parks and recreational facilities to a high standard. <br /> <br />As new facilities are constructedt addition of necessary staffing and maintenance <br />should be an integral part of the planning process. <br /> <br />A Park and Recreation Maintenance Reserve Fund should be established for <br />unexpected and/or major repairs and compliance issues. <br /> <br />Debt Retirement <br />BACKGROUND: Debate over operating deficits at the Skating Center has centered on <br />the total costs of operation including debt service. This distorts the fact that the Skating <br />Center operating expenses and revenues are nearly in balance. The original intent <br />was that revenues should cover the operating expenses only. This is consistent with <br />the management of debt service for other City facilities. This distinction should be <br />made clear. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDA TION: General recreational and/or City funds should be used to <br />fund the debt service of Parks and Recreation programs and facilities. <br /> <br />10) Joint Projects <br /> <br />BACKGROUND: The Committee recognizes the desirability of forming partnerships <br />with other public and private organizations to fund development of community facilities. <br />These partnerships offer novel opportunities to share expenses and leverage funding. <br /> <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.