Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(f'RII i I: 4-, ,em Or ST. ANiHCi\ <br /> <br />TEL:6Il 6Sl Gj2j <br /> <br />p, 'JOj <br /> <br />----- -_._~---- . <br /> <br />,- _._~ .- <br /> <br /> <br />/ <br />/ <br /> <br />/' <br /> <br />City Council Regul[!I' Meeting M~lIutr.s <br />Ja:J\.laT)' 11, 1998 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />1 illtertwining of [he landscaping between the project and the Executive Condominium property. <br />2 The results of the meeting were positive, <br /> <br />3 Mayor Ranallo questioned the price range of the Units. <br /> <br />4 Mr. Mathern stated the rental units would be $900 to $1,200 aIld the condominium~ $90,000 <br />5 tu $125,000. <br /> <br />6 Motion by Marks, second by Faust to approve the rezoning of 3261 Old Highway 8, Lot I, <br />7i Block I, Medtronics Fust Addition, City of S1. Anthony, Hennepin County, State of <br />g Minnesota, from a. Light Industrial zoning designation to an R-4 zoning des.ignation. <br /> <br />9 __-- j\I...,"....,."I.. U"~,~ <br /> <br />10 2. Jim Sarna, Stop 'N' Go; 2400 . 37th Avetlue NE; Requests for Two Sign Variances, <br />11 Commissioner Makowske reported that Mr. Sarna is requMting two varianc~s for signage. <br />12 One variarrce is to allow installation of two monuments signs on the property, Currently, Ih~ <br />13 code only allows one monument sign. Mr. Sarna would like to remove the pylon sign on the <br />14 property and replace it with a mOnument sign. The second variance request is in regard to the <br />15 size of the sign. At the Planning Commission meeting Mr. Sarna had requested a 7 foot by <br />16 10 fool double-sided monument sign and a 6 foot by 8 foot double-sided motlument sign. . <br /> <br />17 Comrtllssioner Makowske noted that Mr. Sarna has now changed his request to include a 7 <br />HI foot by 10 foot double-sided monument sign and a 4 foot by 8 foot double-sided monument <br />19 sign. <br /> <br />20 ~layor Ranallo asked if the change in the proposal would require a public hearing before tP.e <br />21 Planning Commission due to the oppositiorr expressed by residents via a petition received by <br />~2 the Cily. <br /> <br />23 Commissioner Makowske stated he would continue to provide the original report and then <br />24 have Mr. Sarna present the ~hanges in the request. He reported that Mr. Sarna does intend to <br />25 add landscaping and shrubbery to both monuments signs. The proposal -would be an <br />26 improvement and in the past the Planning Commission has been in favor of removing pylon <br />27 signs. Howe',er, in this situation, the Planning Commission was unable to determlne a <br />28 hardship to grant the two requtsted variances. <br /> <br />29 Commissioner Makowske notcd iliat a few years ago the City made a change to tbe Sign <br />30 Ordinance to allow monument signs to contain a ma.ximum of 68 square feet, The Planning <br />31 Commission has tried diligently to adhere to lhis ordinance eKcepl in the case of a <br />32 comprehensive sign package. <br /> <br />33 <br />34 <br /> <br />Jim Sarna, Stop 'N' Go, 2400 - 37th Avenue 1'>'E, stated he would like to n:IDove the pylon <br />sign and place a ground sign on 37111 Avenue and another on Stinson Boulevard, <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />.._L.............'_.....__....______~. <br /> <br />__..... -..r _~_~_ .. d .. _.,_.....-"-+"-___~ _"...,.._..__.~.__'.........____<'"'..._ -.. ,..._ ,~,~,._...__ _.. ..\o..........~ ..-_ .....- -+. .c".. <br />