My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0908_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0908_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2014 3:22:12 PM
Creation date
9/5/2014 11:00:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B <br />ACKGROUND <br />1 <br />Minnesota Statute 462.356 establishes how a City is to effect or realize the goals of its <br />2 <br />Comprehensive Plan once adopted. This particular statute actually precedes the requirement to <br />3 <br />adopt a zoning code that reinforces the Comprehensive Plan, and it requires the City’s “planning <br />4 <br />agency” to review all proposals by the City (or a “special district or agency thereof”) to acquire <br />5 <br />or dispose of land and make findings as to the compliance of the acquisition or disposal with the <br />6 <br />Comprehensive Plan. For Roseville, the Planning Commission is the “planning agency” <br />7 <br />identified in the statute. <br />8 <br />For the purposes of Minn. Stat. 462.356, the Roseville Housing and Redevelopment Authority <br />9 <br />(RHRA) is a special district or agency of the City. City of Roseville already owned the fire <br />10 <br />station property at 2335 Dale Street, and by mid-2013, RHRA had acquired the vacant <br />11 <br />residential property at 2325 Dale Street and the lots at 657 – 675 Cope Avenue to assemble a <br />12 <br />larger redevelopment site. In the fall of 2013, the RHRA requested redevelopment proposals <br />13 <br />from developers that would address the ideas generated by the community workshop hosted by <br />14 <br />the Corridors Development Initiative and selected the proposal presented by the Greater <br />15 <br />Metropolitan Housing Corporation, which included a mix of owner-occupied, one-family <br />16 <br />detached residences and one-family attached townhomes. <br />17 <br />The Planning Commission discussed the issue at its August 6, 2014 meeting. Based on the <br />18 <br />comments and findings detailed in the RPCA prepared for the discussion and its own <br />19 <br />consideration of the proposed development project, the Planning Commission voted <br />20 <br />unanimously to pass a motion communicating its determination that the proposed disposition is <br />21 <br />in compliance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The RPCA prepared for the Planning <br />22 <br />Commission’s review is included with this report as RCA Exhibit A, and the minutes of the <br />23 <br />Commission’s discussion are included with this report as RCA Exhibit B. <br />24 <br />RA <br />ECOMMENDEDCTION <br />25 <br />By motion, receive this report of the Planning Commission’s determination that the <br />26 <br />proposed disposal of 2325 – 2335 Dale Street and 657 – 675 Cope Avenue to facilitate the <br />27 <br />proposed mixed housing development known as the “Dale Street Redevelopment Project” <br />28 <br />is in compliance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as recommended. <br />29 <br />AA <br />LTERNATIVECTIONS <br />30 <br />Pass a motion to table the item for future action. <br />A. Tabling will have no impact on <br />31 <br />meeting the statutory requirement, as it merely mandates that the Planning Commission’s <br />32 <br />findings be reported to the City Council within 45 days of its review. The statute does not <br />33 <br />require the City Council to accept or take any action based on the report. <br />34 <br />Pass a motion to reject the report. <br />B. This, too, will have no impact on meeting the <br />35 <br />statutory requirement, as it merely mandates that the Planning Commission’s findings be <br />36 <br />reported to the City Council within 45 days of its review. The statute does not require the <br />37 <br />. <br />City Council to accept or take any action based on the report <br />38 <br />Prepared by: Senior Planner Bryan Lloyd <br />651-792-7073 | bryan.lloyd@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />RCA Exhibits: A: 8/6/2014 RPCA 8/9/2014 Planning Commission minutes <br />B: <br />RCA_090814.doc <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.