My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03022
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3000
>
pf_03022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:30:03 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 2:46:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3022
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />OC"\ -:. ~- ~D "i:.~ <br /> <br />~ ~ <br />1......""1'-" <br /> <br />.yan Companies <br /> <br />~YAN <br /> <br />I nl,.n\<,U\ulI.;J VI' no. <br />'foJfI SrC"l'lI.d A.wn,,,.. So'Hh <br />U i,.n~o.rvh ).{)>.' 5,5..IO~. '),),';:- <br />~1:v.13h- \200 phu1u- <br />612.'1::1'7 . ~5.5i f,l' <br /> <br />&I/din~ urll11i P..dtlliolHni/J' <br /> <br />October 9) 1996 <br /> <br />Mr. Steve Sarkazy <br />City of RosevilJ e <br />City Hall <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville. MN SS 113-1899 <br /> <br />RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AME1\!>M:E1\7 <br />~ LAKES BUSINESS PARK <br /> <br />Dear Steve: <br /> <br />Thank you for incJuding us in the evaJuation process as the City c:onsidcI'$ the possible locations <br />for the Twin Lakes Parkway. I've received the rq>t)It preplRd by BRW dated September 30th, <br />1996, After revi~ the report. we've come to the folloVling conclusions. <br /> <br />1. Ryan is very supportive of leaving the primary exits from County RDad C to 3SW in thc:ir <br />cunent location. 9Ihile some modifications such as a ramp reconfiguration would be most <br />helpful in providing smoother traffic flow on and off 3SW Ind better access to the freeway, I <br />feel that a total ramp relocation is unnecessary. <br /> <br />2. With the access from County Road C to 3SW defined, we feel the Twin Lakes Parkway will <br />best serve the area if aligned directly with the access as shown OD the plan reccmmcndcd by <br />BRW. 'TbiJ will relieve traffic congestion from County Road C and provide excellent ac:cess <br />to the interior lites in the Twin Lakes redevelopment area. rve looked at all of the parcels <br />and feel that the proposed location aeate.s excellent opportunities for the corporate type users <br />that the City ofRoseville wi.U1cs to see 10cated iD the Twin Lake.s area. <br /> <br />3. R.yan feels that the enbancem=ts such as the bicycle trail walkways should be included in <br />the design. 'Ibese walkways should also have a connection to the Lmgton Lake Park area. <br />This is an ideal amenity for employees of 1hc Twin Lakes srea to \lie c!urina the lunch hoW' <br />and aD ideal spot for the residents of Roseville after workina hours. The landscaping should <br />be conJistcnt with the City's planting plans to maintain the consistency of design throughout <br />the community. <br /> <br />l~.......(__ ""~\L.:I'~..' e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.