Laserfiche WebLink
<br />April 6, 1998 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />communicates a message of seriousness on the part of the City, which may aid the City in the <br />encouragement of redevelopment along the new right~of~way. <br /> <br />The following is a non-inclusive list of benefits: <br /> <br />1. Permits for existing properties on the proposed right-of-way need not be issued, <br />subject to the property owner appealing the decision to the Planning Commis- <br />sion/Council. The statute establishes criteria which will guide the Planning <br />Commission's/Council's issuance of such permits if an appeal is made. <br /> <br />2. If a property owner expands a use, without securing the appropriate pennits from <br />the City after the official m~p has been adopted, the City would not need to pay <br />compensation for the non-conforming expansion. <br /> <br />3. Officially mapping future right-of-way may assist the City in its future planning <br />and budgeting process in that future right-of-way acquisition and construction <br />costs, as well as future possible condemnation costs, will be more certain with an <br />official right-of-way designation. <br /> <br />The following is a non-inclusive list of potential liabilities: <br /> <br />1. This statute has never had a good constitutional test in the courts. There have <br />been several early attorney general opinions regarding the statute, which question <br />the constitutionality of portions of the statute. These opinions indicate that the <br />procedures of the statute may take away a property owner's right to just <br />compensation if a permit is denied or if a condemnation is subsequently started. <br />Those attorney general opinions dealt with a previous version of the statute where <br />legal pre-existing non-conforming uses were not compensable under the statute. <br />I believe the statute now has corrected that flaw and only those non-conforming <br />uses created after the mapping, without proper permits, are exempted from <br />compensation if there is a subsequent condemnation. <br /> <br />2. By adopting the official map, a future favorable private redevelopment of the <br />existing properties may be discouraged. I assume that if this process is <br />commenced, a detailed review of the properties and buildings which would be <br />affected will be inventoried and analyzed to detennine whether the City might be <br />discouraging development or redevelopment which would be beneficial to the <br />City. <br />