My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03022
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3000
>
pf_03022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:30:03 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 2:46:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3022
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />L The proposed Twin Lakes redevelopment project will not have air <br />quality Impacts significant enough to cause a violation of state <br />carbon monoxide standards. <br /> <br />J. Noise levels for the forecast year of 2011, modeled with and <br />without project traffic, are predicted not to exceed the state daytime <br />residential standard of 65 dBA. Project generated traffic is forecast <br />to add 1 dBA or less to noise levels. A change in traffic noise levels <br />of ress than 3 dBA is generally imperceptibre. Therefore, the <br />forecast change in noise associated with project generated traffic is <br />not considered a significant impact. <br /> <br />K. The analysis conducted did not reveal any substantial impacts that <br />would require further investigation prior to proceeding with <br />developmenUredevelopment in the project area. <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />The proposed redevelopment could result <br />improvement through hazardous waste <br />enhancements, and improved infrastructure. <br /> <br />in environmental <br />cleanup, visual <br /> <br />1.4 The following comments have been received: <br /> <br />A. Minnesota Department of Health: Locations and setbacks from <br />contamination of all active, unused, or unsealed wells must be <br />50 feet, 20 feet if the sewer line meets the Minnesota Plumbing <br />Code and is gravity or pressurized for single family use. A <br />sewer line must be no closer than 10 feet to a buried water <br />service line. A welt inventory was recommended. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />B. Metropolitan Council: The EAW is complete and accurate with <br />respect to regional concerns and raises no major issues of <br />consistency. Staff offered comments on the following: grading <br />plans for the new parkway should be reviewed by Metropolitan <br />Council Environmental Services when near metropolitan <br />interceptors; the proposed comprehensive plan amendment for <br />the parkway realignment must be reviewed by the Metropolitan <br />Council; Environmental Site Assessments should be conducted <br />for the parcels to be redeveloped; when available information <br />on soil contamination and leaking storage tanks should be <br /> <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.