Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-......_~ <br /> <br />JUL 22 '98 02:42PM PET, BELL,CONV.JENSE <br /> <br />P.3/4 <br /> <br />2 _ The site was designated as LB. limited husiness, in the comprehensive plan and <br />designated for neighborhood related (;ommcrcial, residential or mixed use in the <br />recently adopted Comprehensive Plan amendments which were based on a study <br />of the entire neighborhood. <br /> <br />3. The site is zoned B-1, limited business and B-2 retail business based on historical <br />uses of the property. Surrounding zoning is residential or limited business. <br />Surrounding uses are limited business, commercial recreation, public recreation <br />and residential. <br /> <br />4. The adopted comprehensive plan and amendments provide guidelines (0 ensure <br />the planned, orderly and staged development and redevelopment of the area <br />consistent with the plan recommendations for the enrire area prepared by the <br />James Addition Task Force. <br /> <br />5. The proposed conditional use permit is inconsistent with the zoning and plan in <br />that no form of auto service facility is a pennitted or conditional use in any LB <br />planning district and parallel B-1 zoning district. Therefore. the applica(ion is <br />inconsistent with (he Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />6. The limited business, residential or mixed use designation emphasizes <br />compatibility with the neighborhood. A B-2 retail use attracts activities <br />incompatible with the neighborhood interest. <br /> <br />7. Traffic generated from comparably sized uses in a retCiil versus a limited business <br />district are two to three times greater exposing lhe neighborhood to unnecessary <br />additional outside traffic incompatible with local circulation and traffic objectives. <br /> <br />8. The proposed site plan screens, fences and separates the parcel from adjacent <br />parcels and tb~ public park. Rather than building on the neighborhoods assets, <br />it seeks to separate itself from (he neighborhood negatively impacting on the <br />property values of the area. <br /> <br />9. The proposed auto service installarion/accessory facility negatively affects the <br />public health. safety and welfare of the area, irnpac(ing property values by failing <br />to integrate with the community, adding traffic beyond tha( anticipated by <br />neighborhood related uses, creating safety problems related to its incompatibility, <br />and endangering the health and safety of residents and children by separating and <br />fencing the sile from the adjacent community park. <br />