My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03032
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3000
>
pf_03032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:30:18 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 2:47:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3032
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2151 MIDLOTHIAN RD
Applicant
DOBESH, JULIE M
PIN
162923110035
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2.3 It is also the policy of the City of Roseville to issue minor variances when there is <br />a hardship or practical difficulty, provided the property is located in an R-1, Single <br />Family Residential District, and used for residential purposes. <br /> <br />2.4 Section 1004.01 (A), City Code, indicates that an accessory building cannot occupy <br />more than 25% of the required rear yard. Section 1004.02(D)(4) requires a corner <br />side yard setback of no less than 30 feet. <br /> <br />3.0 MINOR VARIANCE COMMITTEE <br /> <br />3.1 The request for the variance included the required application form, a sketch of the <br />property, a written statement from the applicant, and written approval from the <br />adjacent property owner affected by the variance (Agnes Gibson at 2143 Midlothian <br />Road). <br /> <br />3.2 The Minor Variance Committee reviewed this request on Monday, June 1, 1998. <br />Ms. Dobesh was present to review her proposal and answer questions. The project <br />was discussed, including the physical hardship created by the property being <br />located on a corner, the physical hardship created by the mature trees in the rear <br />yard, and the practical difficulty of moving the garage to another location on the <br />property. Ms. Dobesh originally proposed a 1008 square foot garage set back the <br />same distance as the existing garage (19'). The Minor Variance Committee was not <br />supportive of the original request; therefore, Ms. Dobesh agreed to modify her <br />request to reduce the depth of the garage from 28' to 22'. This 22' x 36' garage will <br />provide her with the storage space she needs and will allow the setback from <br />County Road B to be increased to 25 feet. This reduction in size also reduces the <br />lot coverage from 35% to 27%. The width of the driveway will not exceed 26 feet <br />at the property line and the applicant will have adequate turn around space on her <br />property to access County Road B head on. Alternative locations for the garage <br />were discussed, with the Minor Variance Committee concurring that the <br />location and size as proposed are the best options from both a functional and <br />aesthetic standpoint. <br /> <br />3.3 The Minor Variance Committee unanimously recommended approval of a minor <br />variance to reduce the comer side yard setback to 25 feet and to increase the rear <br />yard lot coverage to 27% for the purpose of replacing a 16' x 22.5' non-conforming <br />garage with a 22' x 36' garage at 2151 Midlothian Road, based on the following <br />findings: <br /> <br />1. Section 1004.01 (A), City Code, indicates that an accessory building cannot <br />occupy more than 25% of the required rear yard. Section 1004.02(D)(4) <br />requires a corner side yard setback of no less than 30 feet. <br /> <br />2. The location of the property on a corner and the location of a mature tree <br />create a physical hardship, while the location of the existing garage presents <br />a practical difficulty for the applicant. <br /> <br />PF#3032 - RCA (06/08/98) - Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.