My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03047
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3000
>
pf_03047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:30:50 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 2:47:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3047
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />_.) , <br /> <br />(; - ?J' - '1 8" <br /> <br />WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEM No. 4-A <br /> <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br /> <br />Steve Sarkozy, City Manager <br />Dennis Welsch, Community Development Direct~ <br />June 8, 1998 ~tJo.r <br />~\OrJ~T <br />MINOR VARIANCES f.UJI.O)f <br />- reo if\lKS~ /N\ ptvpefttt <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />As an answer to the Minor Variance/Setback issues which eliminates the need for <br /> <br />demonstration of a Variance "hardship", I suggest the following: h.a1ctt, bttlk, d:nsi~ lP <br /> <br />fYI~ o~ ~ri2e.) odback.s ~'~A <br /> <br />Create a "single family/two-family setback permit" process that uses the same minor (~~,S w~ <br />~..IU ".~- <br />variance process, but does not require variance and findings of hardship. It would only /, ~~'ffft -6 <br /> <br />apply to principal structure setbacks and parking setback~ in low density resid~n~iall,~ ~ . ~ S <br /> <br />zoned (R-1 or R-2). ~ c.hC1i'Lf code ~l.Uremerd5 -less It's1Yictnre. C{jf1 eJ1 ~ .~ <br />~bW d&flP "fordoNp"- fiot u, cork (cMcJdi~t) ~ ~ <br />- Q{)P~ r0es tT\or(' 6\11'~1 \... <br />The "single family/two-family setbac permit" could be approved by the staff or Council .~ ~ <br />~ , <br />provided 8 of the following conditions are present: 4... 4- <br /> <br />1. One car garage or less is located on the site. 1. ]. <br /> <br />2. Improves the design or livability of the structure. ~ 6' <br /> <br />3. Improves the terrain or drainage issue. <br /> <br />4. The need for the setback is not created by the current owner. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />5. The existing improvements along with new improvements retain at least <br />65% of the pervious surface of the lot. <br />6. The permit creates no other setback or variance conditions or need. <br />7. The proposed addition improves the aesthetics and the functional use of <br />the site. <br />8. Uses the same exterior structure materials and colors as the principal <br />structure and accessories. <br />9. The building mass is consistent with those adjoining. <br />10. The building or driveway expansion does not place more vehicles <br />adjacent to living quarter first floor bedrooms of adjacent home owners. <br />11. The applicant shall provide drainage and roof gutters to guide water away <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />.~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br />'t <br />~~ <br />~~ <br />~~ <br />~~ <br />,v ~ <br />~~ <br />~ ~ <br />~ ~ <br />'5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.