Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~. <br />5,,,Q <br />~.- <br /> <br />PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT <br />e-mail- BobBierscheid@Roseville.RCMnet.org <br /> <br />August 5, 1998 <br /> <br />CC: <br /> <br />Steve Sarkozy <br />Bob Bierscheid <br />Prince of Peace Proposal Comments From Parks and Recreation <br />Commission <br />Dennis Welsch <br /> <br />To: <br />From: <br />Re: <br /> <br />The Roseville Parks and Recreation Commission, at their August 4 meeting, <br />made the following comments regarding the proposed Prince of Peace Church <br />project next to Central Park: <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER <br />Don Anderson: <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br />(Please see attached questions), Prefer R1 lot as <br />parkland and working with Church to provide shared <br />parking. At a minimum, Church and City need to work <br />together to minimize impact. <br /> <br />Kelley Casey <br /> <br />Prefers option B on site map. It has least impact on <br />neighbors' view of park. Trees need to be left as a <br />buffer to park and install initially as few parking <br />spaces as possible and add more later if needed. <br /> <br />Dennis Malarkey <br /> <br />In best of all worlds would prefer park space, but plan <br />has merit. Prefers site plan B and pleased it would <br />provide additional taxes to City. Parks and <br />Recreation Commission needs to continue to be <br />involved with project. <br /> <br />Tony McGinnity <br /> <br />Again, In best of all worlds would prefer park space <br />but ok with plan as long as Church is willing to work <br />with City and neighbors to limit impact. <br /> <br />George Merrill <br /> <br />Would like more details on plans. Likes the idea of <br />senior housing near the park. <br />