Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Agenda Section: .'W'1> <br />~' <br />LAND USE ~ r(f <br /> <br />Prince of Peace Lutheran Church and Senior Housing Partners, LLC request <br />for an Comprehensive Plan amendment (CH and LR to HR) and concept iJ' ft <br />development plan approval for planned unit development on 8.24 acres~/~ <br />including the existing Prince of Peace Lutheran Church, a 56-unit three-story~ .. <br />senior housing building, and an off-street parking area (PF3049). 01/ <br /> <br />Update: ~. <br />On December 9, 1998 the Roseville Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Prince I ~' <br />of Peace request (PF 3049). The Commission closed the hearing and requested the City ~,..i <br />Council to provide more time for project review. The Commission requested staff to provide .JI. il'b- <br />a review of other sites in the community that could create a precedent (review is attached). The l~ ~ <br />Commission also requested the development team to prepare sight-line studies and vegetation ~ct <br />analysis (review of some viewpoints is attached). The Church also did a photo inventory o~r <br />parking overflow on major church events (review of some view points is attached). The City ( <br />Manager has followed up on a request by the Council to determine if there was Church <br />interest in a joint parking lot project. The Church decided the joint parking lot was not in <br />their interest (letter is attached). Finally, staff reviewed Commission and public comment <br />from the hearing and updated some of the facts in the comment/findings section, concluding <br />that from a land use perspective, the use is still appropriate, but a more sophisticated and . <br />detailed site and building design would be necessary before this concept issue reaches the, ' ". Qt';' ;- ~ <br />Council. See page 8 of this report..! .,~. ~ if <br /> <br />~~~~i <br />On December 14, 1998 the City Council approved an extended review period to March 9, 1999.~$f~~~ <br />...;p ..;f~ <br />On January 13, 1999, the Planning Commission voted (4-2) to recommend an amendment to~<r~ /; <br />the comprehensive plan and PUD concept -only- approval of the proposal with conditions. The;;;:'. " " <br />Church, in turn asked for additional time to work on the building's design details and ~ <br />... <br />improvements to the site and landscape plans along with the more engineering, utility, and ... .;iI", <br />ponding details. See the attached letter from the developers. , " ' ~ . f~ <br />~1~~"" ~~~&J,~ ~~~/ <br />1.0 Requested Action ~~io~t~. ~~:; "Le> ~'"' @i) <br />~. eqti. "~~aSJ ~hde ~~_~I:'A @1'~. '"\. ~ '. ~ Jil <br />. 1.1~ Prince of Peace Lutheran Church ~~~~o~Partners, LLC are reqUesting~anW~". ,:Jt <br />~ '\:JI~~amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan to change the future land use designation o~ ~ <br />~ ~ ,; ~ 6.13 acre parcel from Church to High Density Residential (2561 Victoria Street North - .~&. <br />_.~. :~ ~ ~-~rince of Peace Lutheran Church) and the designation of a 2.11 acre parcel from Low ~ <br />~\11 ~ ~ ~ Density Resident~al to High Density Residential (255,5 Victo~ia Street North - Lloyd Z., <br />~~~ ' .VHuberty Et AI). Pnnce of Peace Lutheran Church and Seruor Housmg Partners, LLC, are also ,~ <br />'" !b\ reque~ concept development plan approval on the co~, b, ined site 0: 8.24 acres for a m..~e dJ!. <br />~ ~ ~ ' t<;) n A'+..V ~.' · "S}f ..to <br />~ ~ . ~ I ~ ~ ~, <br />, ~,,~. ~~LVPF. CA 5/ ')~'ageJ '. <br /> <br />~ '~~~^"'~~~" '#:~~^_..r-r:rI~ . ,J~,C~ '#~fr'fh)/',I <br />~ ~ufF ~ 'ifiF ~~ ~~. rJY ~ ~ ~ if ~ ~ _~~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~:J.IJI <br /> <br /> <br />Manager Approved: <br /> <br />