Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the minimum requirements for retention in this area. The utilities will also need to <br />be reviewed and modified as needed. A copy of the memo from Assistant Public <br />Works Director Deb Bloom is attached. <br /> <br />7. The Fire Marshal expressed concerns with the size of the water main. The six-inch <br />water main will need to be enlarged and/or looped to provide adequate service. In <br />addition, the radius of the roadway between the senior housing building and the <br />existing church appears to be too tight to accommodate the City's fire equipment. <br />The location and height of the canopy compounds this problem. <br /> <br />8. The project as proposed includes 163,530 square feet (3.75 acres) of impervious <br />coverage, including 47,080 square feet of buildings and 116,450 square feet of <br />pavement (driveways and parking). With a site area of 8.24 acres, this results in an <br />impervious lot coverage percentage of 45%. <br /> <br />9. The amount of parking provided on site should be the minimum needed at this time. <br />Based on a seating capacity of 500 (sanctuary and gathering space - simultaneous <br />services), a minimum of 143 parking spaces are required for the church use (1 space <br />per 3.5 seats). The 56 underground parking spaces combined with the 28 spaces <br />between the senior housing building and the church meet the 1.5 space per unit <br />requirement for senior housing, with the joint use of the church lot providing any <br />required overflow parking. Rather than including all 191 spaces at this time, the size <br />of the parking lot should be reduced to 143. The parking lot could then be expanded <br />to provide additional parking as the church grows. The Parks and Recreation <br />Commission expressed a strong interest in having a joint parking arrangement <br />between the parking area on the south side of the property and the park parking lot <br />to the south. At a minimum, direct pedestrian access should be provided between <br />these two parking lots. <br /> <br />10. Traffic generated from the senior housing project is estimated at less than three trips <br />per day per unit, or 170 trips per day total. Both Victoria and County Road C have <br />capacity for this small number of trips. <br /> <br />11. As an alternative to the current proposal, owners of the Huberty property could <br />subdivide the R-l site into five or six single family lots with a new road serving both <br />the church and the Huberty site. Single family lots on this side slope would require <br />substantial regrading, new utility excavation and road work to each site. Such a <br />proposal would put residential backyards, decks, sheds, and other exterior <br />improvements adjacent to the park with no shared public parking or access. In <br />summary, the amount of soil and vegetation disturbance may be similar to the <br />proposed construction of the parking lot, but the amount of surface to be replanted <br />in residential yards would significantly exceed the proposed parking lot. <br /> <br />12. The Comprehensive Plan and City housing policies support the location of a senior <br />housing facility in this location; however, the proximity of the building to Central <br /> <br />PF3049 - RCA (01/25/99) - Page 6 of 9 <br />