Laserfiche WebLink
<br />An excerpt from the goals and policies section of the Comprehensive Plan is attached. <br />These goals and policies stress the need for a mix of housing styles and types to meet <br />the needs of a broad range of citizens. <br /> <br />2. In 1998, the City conducted a senior housing market feasibility study with the <br />consulting firm of Health Planning and Management Resources. The proposed <br />project could meet the identified need for senior housing in Roseville, as revealed by <br />the study, if the units are affordable and are sold/rented to Roseville residents. (A <br />summary of the study key finding is attached.) <br /> <br />3. In conjunction with the application for concept plan approval, the following <br />documents have been submitted and reviewed by staff in preparation of this report: <br /> <br />. Boundary and topographic survey (10/22/98) <br />. Preliminary site and grading (11/6/98) <br />. Site plan (11/9/98) <br />. Landscape plan (11/9/98) <br />. Building elevations (11/9/98) <br />. Site profile (11/9/98) <br />. Floor plans including basement garage plan, main level plan, upper levels plan, <br />and unit plans (11/9/98) <br /> <br />4. The Comprehensive Plan needs to be amended to accommodate the proposed <br />development on this site. If the planned unit development is approved, the underlying <br />zoning would be R-3, General Residence District. This district requires a minimum <br />lot area of 2,000 square feet per one-bedroom unit and 2,800 square feet per two- <br />bedroom unit, as well as a maximum floor area ratio of 0.5. Since the senior housing <br />portion of the project would require a minimum lot area of 3.38 acres to meet this <br />density requirement, the project as proposed on 8.24 acres easily meets these <br />standards and the criteria within the planned unit development provisions. <br /> <br />5. The topography of the site, the presence of Bennett Lake, and the location of the site <br />on a comer of two County roadways present development challenges for the site. In <br />order to meet the 75 foot setback requirement from Bennett Lake, the building has <br />been placed approximately 15 feet from the edge of the right-of-way for County <br />Road C. Because ofthe width of County Road C, this should not present a problem <br />and can be allowed as part of the planned unit development. <br /> <br />6. The Engineering review of this project indicated that the dedication of an additional <br />10 feet of right-of-way will be required along Victoria Street for implementation of <br />the Ramsey County Master Street Plan. Engineering also had concerns with the <br />grading plan, especially the extensive use of retaining walls, the steep slopes <br />included, and potential problems with erosion control during construction. In <br />addition, the retention ponds shown on the grading plan must be redesigned to meet <br /> <br />PF3049 - RCA (01/25/99) - Page 5 of9 <br />