Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(A summary ofthe study key finding is attached.) <br /> <br />3. In conjunction with the application for concept plan approval, the following <br />documents have been submitted and reviewed by staff in preparation of this <br />report: <br /> <br />. Boundary and topographic survey (10/22/98) <br />. Preliminary site and grading (11/6/98) <br />. Site plan (11/9/98) <br />. Landscape plan (11/9/98) <br />. Building elevations (11/9/98) <br />. Site profile (11/9/98) <br />. Floor plans including basement garage plan, main level plan, upper levels plan, <br />and unit plans (11/9/98) <br /> <br />4. The Comprehensive Plan needs to be amended to accommodate the proposed <br />development on this site. If the planned unit development is approved, the <br />underlying zoning would be R-3, General Residence District. This district requires <br />a minimum lot area of 2,000 square feet per one-bedroom unit and 2,800 square <br />feet per two-bedroom unit, as well as a maximum floor area ratio of 0.5. Since the <br />senior housing portion of the project would require a minimum lot area of 3.38 <br />acres to meet this density requirement, the project as proposed on 8.24 acres easily <br />meets these standards and the criteria within the planned unit development <br />provisions. <br /> <br />5. The topography of the site, the presence of Bennett Lake, and the location of the <br />site on a corner of two County roadways present development challenges for the <br />site. In order to meet the 75 foot setback requirement from Bennett Lake, the <br />building has been placed approximately 15 feet from the edge of the right-of-way <br />for County Road C. Because of the width of County Road C, this should not present <br />a problem and can be allowed as part of the planned unit development. <br /> <br />6. The Engineering review of this project indicated that the dedication of an <br />additional 10 feet of right-of-way will be required along Victoria Street for <br />implementation of the Ramsey County Master Street Plan. Engineering also had <br />concerns with the grading plan, especially the extensive use of retaining walls, the <br />steep slopes included, and potential problems with erosion control during <br />construction. In addition, the retention ponds shown on the grading plan must be <br />redesigned to meet the minimum requirements for retention in this area. The <br />utilities will also need to be reviewed and modified as needed. A copy of the memo <br />from Assistant Public Works Director Deb Bloom is attached. <br /> <br />7. The Fire Marshal expressed concerns with the size ofthe water main. The six-inch <br />water main will need to be enlarged and/or looped to provide adequate service. In <br />addition, the radius of the roadway between the senior housing building and the <br />existing church appears to be too tight to accommodate the City's fire equipment. <br /> <br />PF3049 - RPCA (01/13/99) - Page 5 of8 <br />