pf_03049 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

be the last opportunity for Planning Commission review. The final development plan, final plat, and planned unit development agreement does not require Planning Commission review prior to City Council action (unless the Planning Commission requests another detailed design review prior to the final approval stage and the Council concurs ). 5.2 By motion, recommend approval (denial) of the request for an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan to change the future land use designation of both parcels to High Density Residential and approval (denial) of the concept development plan for a mixed use planned unit development including the existing Prince of Peace Lutheran Church, a 56-unit three-story senior housing building, and an off-street parking area, based on the findings outlined in Section 3, subject to the following conditions: a. Prior to requesting concept approval from the City Council, the applicant will hold a design meeting with neighbors and interested public (including the Planning Commission members if interested) to identify specific changes in site design and landscaping, materials, massing, and visual screening from the Lake. b. The applicant will include building design materials (brick, masonry, and natural materials) that match those of the existing Church building. c. The applicant will redesign the building mass to be consistent with the height, width, and size of the existing Church building. d. The applicant will request, in writing, the Council on January 25,1999, accept a 60 day time extension to the project review process for further design refinement. If the Council approves the concept PUD and the change in the Comprehensive Plan, the PUD does not take effect until after final approvals of the PUD and Subdivision and respective agreements; and review and approval of the Comprehensive Plan change by the Metropolitan Council; and publication of the PUD ordinance. 5.3 The Planning Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for final action on January 25,1998. The developer may ask, in writing, for another 60 day extension before submitting the concept and design documents to the Council for their decision. Please note that this is a change from the date stated in the public hearing notice for this request. Attachments: Property location map; notice of public hearing; Comprehensive Plan vision statement, goals, and policies for residential areas; summary of senior housing study (7/98); boundary & topographic survey; preliminary site & grading plan; memo from Deb Bloom (Assistant Public Works Director); site plan; landscape plan; site profile; building elevations; building floor plans; excerpt of Planning Commission minutes (7/8/98); overview of Parks and Recreation Commission discussion (8/4/98); excerpt from Planning Commission minutes (8/12/98); letters submitted to date regarding the request; Letter to Steve Sarkozy re: City/Church options; staffreport on similar situations within the City. 60-day Time Limit: Application accepted on November 9, 1998; On December 14,1998, the decision deadline was extended to March 9,1999 by the City Council for the concept PUD; the final PUD, ordinance, and agreement are considered a separate application. Prepared by: Kim L. Lee, AICP (490-2236) and Dennis Welsch (490-2232) Q:\Planning Files\3049_Prince of Peace\RPCA(01l399).doc PF3049 - RPCA (01/13/99) - Page 8 of 8