My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03049
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3000
>
pf_03049
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:31:07 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 2:47:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3049
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
2561 VICTORIA ST N
Applicant
PRINCE OF PEACE CHURCH
PIN
032923230019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Rosevillle <br />Community Development Dept <br /> <br />What defines whether a business can be 24-hr? Is it implicit in a B3 <br />zoning? <br /> <br />----------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />File 3049 - Prince of Peace <br /> <br />What is the status of Corpus Christi regarding their request for on-site r- <br />senior housing development? How is analagous to POP? <br />,....- <br />What is the "median" referred to when we say 40% of units are affordable <br />by persons at 60% of the median income? (age, place of residence, etc.) <br /> <br />Who is a "senior"? How old are the seniors who move into Rosevill~ <br />senior housing? <br /> <br />How is the resale price of units determined? Do 40% of units stay . <br />affordable, as above? I understand there is a 3%/year cap on equity <br />increase: do these units become "cheaper" if the overall housing market <br />goes up 10%; where does the equity interest differential go (if the equity <br />is invested at a higher rate of return)? . <br /> <br />Can we see a preliminary drawing of a re-routed path from Victoria/C intq,.,.- <br />the park which would replace the unofficial neighborhood path currently <br />used? When would a replacement be built? ' <br /> <br />Assume the Huberty property gets developed as R1 subdivision instead -:( <br />please predict building heights, distance from Lake Bennett, and visual <br />impacts to the W, Sand E. <br /> <br />What is the height of POP's new proposed building? Compared to the tree <br />line? Compared to the church? <br /> <br />Many Lake Owasso residents watch city JulyA fireworks from the lake- <br />will they still be able to as well as before? <br /> <br />, , <br />. . <br />, . <br />The developer needs to supply projected views from across the lake, the S <br />side of Lake Bennett (1/2 way between bandshelland big kid playground), ' <br />the view from Cty C and from FiskNictoria. <br /> <br />I couldn't tell how far the building would be from the actual Cty.C <br />roadbed. The plan shows a straight Cty C when the ~oad curves. <br /> <br />Has the ponding plan now met standards? Will ponding have to be fenced~ <br /> <br />Is the Huberty property a bluff impact zone? Dothe regulations for bluff <br />impact zones affect the proposed parking? (1016.17H2) Is there a '~tier' <br />area" where % impervious is limited (1 016.24G4B)? <br /> <br />Codes 1 016.24G5B and 1 016.17G seem to address max,ir)1um building heights in <br />PUD or R1 in shoreland. Does the plan meet code?: . . <br /> <br />Code 1016.24G3A stipulates 50%open sp~ce inshorelaDPUD: d..6esthe' PI~n,..'/,. ,'. <br />meet code? . " " .' . .,: ~ ,.' . <br /> <br /> <br />)~ Lt 2- f.tuj- Ivri <br />~ oSftt \~' .~~ <br />t~Lk <br /> <br />O'i <br />--------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />That's alii thought of - thanks for your help. <br />-Peggy Egli <br /> <br />Dennis Welsch <br />Community Dev. Director <br />Phone 651-490-2232 <br />Fax: 651-490-2931 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />City of Roseville <br />Community Development <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville. Mn. 55113 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.