My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0825
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0825
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2014 9:34:50 AM
Creation date
9/11/2014 9:30:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/25/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,August 25,2014 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Councilmember Laliberte reported on her recent attendance at a joint Arden Hills, Shore- <br /> view and Roseville Chamber of Commerce meeting, where Metropolitan Transit's Bus <br /> Rapid Transit (BRT) representatives unveiled projected plans for possible routes and pre- <br /> liminary information as part of a future expansion into the TCAAP redevelopment area. <br /> However, Councilmember Laliberte advised that Metro Transit had no definite <br /> timeframe in mind, and that it was not on their current list of priorities. Councilmember <br /> Laliberte stated that a number of good questions were raised by members of the business <br /> community and municipal representative; including the potential for construction of a <br /> park and ride to support a BRT since it was not considered sustainable as an urban BRT <br /> and requiring other modes of transportation to connect to other lines. Councilmember <br /> Laliberte noted that the next BRT slated was the West Seventh Street line, but at the re- <br /> quest of Ramsey County and the City of St. Paul, the Metro Transit had put that project <br /> on hold for completion of the Ramsey County Transportation Study. When asked about <br /> available funding for that proposed BRT line, Metro Transit representatives advised that <br /> those funds had been diverted to the Penn Avenue BRT line as part of their criteria was <br /> for a "shovel ready" project. Therefore, Councilmember Laliberte reported that those <br /> funds would not be kept in this area for other uses, even though University of Northwest- <br /> ern-St. Paul representatives had provided information on their projected ridership and <br /> other businesses expressed their interest in incorporating their employee base into plans <br /> for a BRT in this area. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Councilmember Laliberte advised that <br /> whether a future Hamline or Lexington Avenue BRT path was chosen, it would eventual- <br /> ly serve businesses along that pat and connect to Highway 96, with TCAAP as the end <br /> destination for the line. When she asked about phasing of the BRT line, Councilmember <br /> Laliberte advised that Metro Transit representatives talked about phasing with regular <br /> bus routes rather than and before consideration of extending the BRT line. <br /> Mayor Roe thanked Councilmember Laliberte for her ongoing advocacy for improved <br /> transportation in Roseville and the northern suburbs. <br /> Mayor Roe provided a brief update on the Comcast Cable Franchise Renewal process and <br /> formal negotiations proceeding to the administrative hearing stage with dates still pend- <br /> ing. Mayor Roe confirmed that the Shoreview City Council, one of the ten member cit- <br /> ies, had voted at their recent meeting to pull out of the commission,potentially changing <br /> the membership. Mayor Roe advised that the rationale of the City of Shoreview in mak- <br /> ing this decision was based in part to legal and consulting fee costs for the renewal pro- <br /> cess as well as the general working relationship of the cable commission with Comcast, <br /> even though theirs seemed to be a minority view among member cities. Since the City of <br /> Shoreview has until October 15, 2014 to make their final decision, Mayor Roe expressed <br /> his hope that something happened in the meantime with informal negotiations to resolve <br /> the remaining issues. However, Mayor Roe advised that the Shoreview City Council had <br /> authorized their City Manager to hire an attorney to negotiate on their behalf in this pro- <br /> cess; and as a result were no longer participating in commission negotiations, including <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.