My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0825
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0825
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2014 9:34:50 AM
Creation date
9/11/2014 9:30:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/25/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, August 25,2014 <br /> Page 8 <br /> of that group; however, she advised that she was not comfortable approving items <br /> without a specific number to determine budget impacts versus a vague supposi- <br /> tion. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon suggested approval of the item be deferred to a later <br /> meeting once staff provided that information. <br /> Willmus moved, Etten seconded, TABLING to a later date the consideration of a <br /> revised Ramsey County GIS User Group Joint Powers Agreement. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee, and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> g. Approve 701 Emerald Ridge Encroachment Agreement <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, City Manager Trudgeon briefly reviewed this re- <br /> quest as detailed in the RCA dated August 25, 2014. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte again expressed her general support for moving for- <br /> ward with this request; however, as noted in the RCA (lines 14 — 18), she ques- <br /> tioned if agreements were in place for those other encroachment areas. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon responded that staff had been unable to determine how <br /> and why agreements had not been done as part of the permitting process for exist- <br /> ing structures encroaching on the easement; but as mentioned during his initial <br /> summary, staff would be following up to determine if the current easement width <br /> was necessary, or could be reduced to eliminate the need for pursuing agreements <br /> with all affected property owners. Short of that, Mr. Trudgeon advised that struc- <br /> tures were not allowed on easements and would need to be removed as applicable <br /> to ensure access by the City to infrastructure as needed. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that there should be some standardization and <br /> fairness applied for all property owners. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon noted that this request had been prompted due to the ur- <br /> gency of the homeowner to build a deck during this construction season, and as <br /> part of the permitting process, the situation had been discovered and was intended <br /> for resolution, along with issues at adjacent properties. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that, with respect to fairness, since the background was un- <br /> known, staff was attempting to resolve the situation now on one way or another. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, City Engineer Mark Culver addressed <br /> the depth of sanitary sewer service in this area; with Councilmember Willmus <br /> noting that the deeper the lines, the wider easement area needed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.