Laserfiche WebLink
<br />To Whom It May Concern: <br /> <br />We are hoping to build an unattached garage to our property on 2255 Cleveland Ave, North. As you will <br />see from the attached plat map, our lot is I acre and divided in such a way that makes it a long and <br />somewhat narrow strip of property. Our current garage, which is a tuck under, is built into the side of the <br />home facing the driveway and the street. The front and back of our home face the side yards. <br /> <br />Current city building codes allow for a garage to be built either on the back or the side yard of the property, <br />However, given the uniqueness of our property and the area of Roseville in which we live, we are <br />requesting a variance to this rule and respectfully request that the city will allow us to build the garage in <br />the front portion of our property, <br /> <br />Following are a list of our concerns and reasons we believe the city ordinance for garage placement are <br />impractical when pertaining to our specific property. <br /> <br />. It would be impossible to put a garage in the back of our property since it contains wetland and <br />important drainage. <br /> <br />. There is the least space in the side yards between our home and the adjoining property. Even though <br />our lot is large, it is long and narrow. The side yards of our property have limited space between the <br />house and end of our property line, <br /> <br />. Building the garage on either side of our home would also be aesthetically unappealing and make it <br />seem "top heavy." It would make the center of our property look crowded with building structure <br />while the front remains open. <br /> <br />. It may also cause drainage trouble. When our house was built, fill was put in to create a gentle <br />downward decline away from the home that in turn allows the drainage to flow away from the house, <br /> <br />. Because many of our older trees have died (and are continuing) to die from Oakwilt, we are constantly <br />planting trees to maintain the current "woods" feeling the neighborhood has. We have worked hard to <br />replace... and have spent close to $10,000.00 in new trees; such as sugar maples, spruce, pines, and <br />lindens. These trees are beginning to mature and are now close to 6 inches in diameter. Many of them <br />are planted on the side and back yard, Our side yard facing the East has several mature oaks as well. <br />A garage built on either of our property would force us to cut some of these trees down. <br /> <br />. It would be so aesthetically poor to put a garage toward either side of the house; it would devalue our <br />property . <br /> <br />On the attached lot drawing, you will see the requested placement of the garage to be in front of the house <br />somewhat off to the side. This is currently an empty spot of little use for much and we are listing several <br />reasons why we believe this to be the best and most practical spot to place the new garage. <br /> <br />. There are no trees in this spot to cut. Weeds are the only vegetation currently growing there. <br /> <br />. The front portion of our [at contains the majority of open space. <br /> <br />. This spot now is basically an "ugly-open hole," <br /> <br />. It nears the entrance to the lower level of our home, <br /> <br />. It is located off the existing driveway in the most logical area of the property. <br /> <br />. The proposed location has the least impact on the neighboring properties. <br />