Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"From Jeff Bronow, TA Inc. to 651 490 2931 <br /> <br />at 11/19/99 11:04 AM <br /> <br />Pg 003/005 <br /> <br />marginal costs fi)r each of the divisions in the Community Development fund. <br /> <br />3. On Page 18, there were questions regarding the 21 year population and job growth <br />nmnbers with the nmnber 21 circled. <br /> <br />Growth from 1999 to 2020 is used and this represents a 21 year period. <br /> <br />4. On Page 22 there was a question about the source of the 13.04 million square feet of <br />nonresidential space in the City. This question was also asked on Page 43. <br /> <br />111is total was based on the number of employees by employee type times the square feet per <br />employee estimate. The total employment and the square feet per employee by employment <br />type were provided by the City. I estimated the employment breakdown based on data provided <br />from the Minnesota Department of Economic Security, which breaks down employment by SIC <br />category. If the City has better data. or a better methodology, please let me know, and I will <br />make the appropriate changes. <br /> <br />5. On Page 25, there was a question regarding the City Planning Conunission and <br />something else I can't read. <br /> <br />I am not sure what this is referring to. Please not that all operating expenditures in the General <br />Fund have been accounted for and discussed in the LOS document. <br /> <br />6. On Page 29, there was a question about whether or not the Police calls for service <br />percentage distribution between residential and nonresidential land uses would change <br />with growth. <br /> <br />Yes, this percentage will most likely change, particularly given that the City is anticipating a lot <br />more nonresidential development in the fiJture compared to relatively small amounts of <br />residential development. The baseline percentage, however, is used to calculate the associated <br />cost per person and cost per nonresidential trip (a good indicator of activity). These baseline <br />costs will remain constant. That is, even though the percentage of total calls for nonresidential <br />will increase, the net cost per trip should remain the same (assuming current service levels). <br />Total trips will also increase, rcsulting in more nonresidential police costs, but the cost pcr trip <br />will not change. <br /> <br />7. On Page 30, it was indicated that new growth may indeed require the need for new fire <br />equipment. <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />This was not what I was told during the interview process. If this is of concern, please check ---- 1J' <br />with the Fire Chief (showing him the scenarios) and let me know if there are to be any changes <br />relating to this. <br /> <br />8. On Page 31, there is a comment indicating that the concentrated growth scenario <br />reflects a 100 percent increase in jobs. This refers to the statement in the LOS that the <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />