pf_03065 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

'From Jeff Bronow, TA Inc. to 651 490 2931 at 11/19/99 11:04 AM Pg 004/005 methodology assumes that the regional jobs to housing ratio remains constant. The jobs to housing ratio in Roseville will ~ertainly increase under the concentrated growth projections, but it is assumed that the regional jobs to housing ratio is assumed to remain constant. 9. On Page 32 there is a statement indicating that it is not true that no redevelopment occurs wtder the Trends scenario, rather redevelopment just occurs at slower rates. The scenario descriptions provided by the City indicates that the assumption was made that there was to be a complete build out of all vacant developable land. The description further states that: "Trend Development was examined in two parts. First, the projected growth of residential units, and second, the projected gro\\1h in employment. In both cases, the underlying Future Land Use assigned to each parcel of vacant developable land was used to fonnulate the number of residential units that each parcel could support or the number of jobs. If the City wishes to change these assumptions, let me know. And please provide a revised scenario description. If redevelopment does occur under the Trends scenario, I need to know how nmch ofthe projected growth is redevelopment and how much is development of vacant land. -- 10. On Page 33, it was indicated that the table at the top of the page was confusing. I will reverse the table to make it more clear indicating percent redevelopment instead of percent ~~~~~~ - 11. On Page 33, there is a question regarding whether the City provided data on the new market value versus the replaced market value of residential development. This data was not provided. Similar data on for retail space was also not provided. Hence, I made the assumptions I did. The City either needs to provide the data or let me know if the estimates are not valid and then provide me with better estimates. luere is another comment on the bottom ofthe page that I cmmot read. 12. On Page 34 there is a question of where the apartment class rate is in the table. It was also indicated that the local sales ratio is 90 percent. This will be addcd to thc tablc in thc final version ofthe model and was inadvcrtcntly lcft out when it was being prepared for the draft LOS. The local sales ratio can be adjusted. 13. On Page 36 there is a question of what the personal property assessed value is. This value refers to utilities and other non-exempt personal property for non-residential development. Given that a significant majority of personal property is exempt from this tax. we have, with input from metro council, chosen not to try to measure this. This is consistent with aU the other cities evaluated as part ofthis study. Page 4