My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03065
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3000
>
pf_03065
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:31:50 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 2:48:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3065
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Trends growth scenario. <br /> <br />21. Fiscal Disparities Distribution per Person. This is calculated each year based on the annual <br />percent change in Citywide assessed property value per person (Point 22). If the assessed <br />value per person goes up from the previous year. then in general the relative fiscal capacity of <br />the City increases compared to the areawide pool (assuming the pool stays constant). This <br />results in an expected smaller amount of fiscal disparities distribution per person. Our <br />methodology reduces the fiscal disparities distribution per person by the same percentage <br />increase in the assessed value per person. <br /> <br />22. Assessed Value per Person. This measure is determined by dividing the total Citywide <br />assessed value by the Citywide population each year and is used to calculate annual percent <br />changes. (See point 23 below). <br /> <br />23. Percent Change in Assessed Value per Person. This percentage change is derived from the <br />annual change in assessed value per person and is used to determine the annual change in the <br />Fiscal Disparities distribution per person as explained in Points 9 and 22 above. <br /> <br />24. FD Revenues as % of Certified uvy. This measure is shown for information purposes to <br />understand how it changes over time for each scenario projection. In general, the percentage <br />should decrease as the fiscal capacity of the City increases. <br /> <br />25. FD Revenues per Person. This measure is also shown for informational purposes to <br />understand how it changes over time. <br /> <br />26. Total Class 3 Real Property Market Value. Class 3 Real Property Value applies to <br />commercial, industrial. and employment property. This is used as the numerator to calculate <br />the CII market value percentage of total market value in the City (Point 28), which is used to <br />calculate the (:ity Revenue Need (Point 32). <br /> <br />27. Total Real and Personal Market Value. This is the total market value in the City for each <br />year. This is used as the denominator to calculate the CII market value percentage of total <br />market value in the City (Point 28), which is used to calculate the City Revenue Need (Point <br />32). <br /> <br />28. CIl Market Value Percentage. This is used to calculate the City Revenue Need (Point 32) <br />based on the State formula used to calculate Local Government Aid. <br /> <br />29. Pre.1940 Housing Units. This is used to determine the pre-1940 housing unit percentage <br />(Point 31), which is used to calculate the City Revenue Need (point 32). <br /> <br />30. Total Housing Units. This is also used to determine the pre-1940 housing unit percentage <br />(Point 31), which is used to calculate the City Revenue Need (Point 32). <br /> <br />Page 40 <br /> <br />Tischler & Associates, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.