Laserfiche WebLink
<br />There are several other taSks which will help to translate these community/school district fmdings to <br />results that can be utilized for the region. One taSk is the calculation of prototype fiscal results for <br />specific land uses. Unlike the comprehensive fiscal evaluations conducted for the two scenarios, which <br />include the interaction of the forecasted residential/nomesidentialland uses, the prototype fiscal analysis <br />takes a snap shot of what the direct fiscal result is by type of land use. We will calculate the cost for a <br />single-family unit as well as the other relevant land uses as discussed later. <br /> <br />Another task which will meet the objectives of this RFP is to work with Metro Council staff in <br />preparing a regional fiscal impact assessment. The consultant team will bring its expertise from <br />throughout the US and also help to further interpret the fmdings of the ten entities to develop a regional <br />fiscal impact assessment. Another important taSk is the preparation of a paper on possible <br />implementation strategies which recommends ways in which the various commuirities in the region <br />might enhance the develop patterns in the Metro area. <br /> <br />TASK 1 Provide Technical Assistance Regarding Scenarios for Each Community and/or <br />School District. <br /> <br />A critical first step is to further define the two scenarios - current trends and the Council's adopted <br />regional growth strategy - in terms of land use categories. Since the Council staff has community level <br />population. household and employment forecasts, we will recommend the specific' land use categories <br />that should be utilized for each of the selected communities and school districts. For example, there are <br />likely to be at least two residential categories and four nonresidential categories. The specific land use <br />categories are likely to vary by particular community based. on their zoninglland use classification. <br />However an effort will be made to evaluate fairly standard categories. As part of this task, we will <br />provide technical support in determining the employment allocations and land use category <br />assumptions. <br /> <br />As part of this task, we will also provide input to the list of non-fIscal impacts that Council staff will <br />study during the same time frame. . <br /> <br />An option for each of the selected communities and school districts will be to have up to four fIscal <br />analysis zones or geographic subareas. The benefit of having such a fiscal analysis zone (PAZ) is to <br />allow a further refinement in the demands for seIVices, available and excess capacity of capital facilities <br />and different impacts on. costs as well as possibly revenues.. For.example.. if St. Paul is one. of the <br />sample communities, there could be' an area within the City where there is disinvestment. If an F AZ <br />reflected disinvestment, T A would consider not only the loss in revenues within that F AZ, but also <br />increased costs incmred. (TA condu~ one of the fust disinv~nt fiscal analyses for Little Rock). <br />T A will discuss the practicality as well. as the ~irability. of the specific F AZci with Council: staff and <br />those representing the community and/or school district. - The hind use asSumptions will be forecasted <br />for each F AZ. Therefore, it is likely that for some F AZs experiencing stagnation or disinvestment, <br />there may be decreases in certain types of land use. The forecasts will be for up to 20 years. <br /> <br />Work Product: Memoranda as Appropriate Commentirig on Land Use Forecasts and Narrative <br />for the Two Scenarios. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Tischler & Associates, Inc. <br />