Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TASK 2 <br /> <br />Attend Liaison Group Meeting <br /> <br />We will attend a liaison group meeting in which the various scenarios, land use categories, forecasts by <br />FAZ. and other topics are discusses. We will be a resource at the meeting and be available to answer <br />relevant questions and explain various approaches. <br /> <br />Work Product: Presentation and Appropriate Supporting Material. <br /> <br />TASK 3 Conduct CommuDity Level of Service and Cost and Revenue Factor Interviews <br /> <br />In this task we will interview the community andlor school district providers in order to evaluate the <br />level of service and cost and revenue factors which will be utilized in the analysis. The intent, reflecting. <br />the case study-marginal cost approach, will be to include all general funded activities which will be <br />affected by development. It is important to note that T A will not be asking the departments to calculate <br />the future demands 1 to 20 years from now for each alternative. Rather we will interview the <br />department and ascertain relevant factors and information to utilize. Our fiscal system designed for <br />each community/school district will then calculate these demands. Our data collection will include <br />capital cos~, operating and maintenance expenses affected by any capital facility changes, other <br />operating expenses as well as all revenues. . <br /> <br />In discussing capital facility needs with the Client, we will utilize one of two approaches. One approach <br />will be direct entry of capital facility information, if it is known through the CIP that the facility will be <br />constructed. and will partially or fully serve new growth. A second approach is for our fiscal impact <br />system to calculate the need for n~w capital facilities as a function of the existing available capacity and <br />the demands for service generated by the new development. <br /> <br />Utilities, as well as roads, will be included if appropriate information is available from City sources on <br />the City costs. ,- <br /> <br />As part of this task we anticipate having some participation from Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and <br />Associates. 1beir engineering and cost analysis experience and information regarding infrastIUcmre in <br />the Metro Council area is extensive. They will assist us regarding this topic as appropriate. <br /> <br />Work Product: See Below <br /> <br />TASK 4 Prepare Level of Service and Cost and Revenue Factor Memorandum <br /> <br />." -- <br /> <br />The infonnation collected through the onsite-interViews, as.well as othe~ soUrces' ~iJ) be ~~bed in the <br />Level of Service and Cost and Revenue Factor Memorandum. 'Given the scale of some of city/school . <br />district operations. it is,likely that some operating costs will be semivariabie or fixed. However, it is <br />also possible that there may be "lumpy" capital facilities that need to be built to serVe new growth. under <br />so~ of the alternatives. 1be document will contain data assumptions. appropriate narrative and a flow <br />chart showing the relationship to the demand for services. The draft will be sent to each <br />community/school district for its "sign off'. After mutually agreed changes are made the final <br />memorandum will be issued. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Tischler & Associates, Inc, <br />