Laserfiche WebLink
It should be noted that staff has just received this drawing and has threrfore not evaluated this <br />30 <br />plan for consistency with all nuances of the Regulating Plan, only building placement which is a <br />31 <br />critical element of the project. Updates on compliance with the Regulating Plan will be provided <br />32 <br />verbally at the meeting if necessary. <br />33 <br />PO <br />OLICYBJECTIVE <br />34 <br />The policy objective of this discussion is to provide feedback to Cities Edge regarding their <br />35 <br />redevelopment proposal and direct the Planning Division regarding any specific Code items the <br />36 <br />Council would like to see further addressed. <br />37 <br />BI <br />UDGET MPLICATIONS <br />38 <br />None. <br />39 <br />SR <br />TAFF ECOMMENDATION <br />40 <br />The proposed site plan appears to be in general compliance with building placement. Additional <br />41 <br />staff recommendations will be provided verbally after staff has more time to review the <br />42 <br />document that was just received. <br />43 <br />RCA <br />EQUESTED OUNCIL CTION <br />44 <br />Review sketch plan and provide developers with any feedback regarding the design concept and <br />45 <br />desired modifications. <br />46 <br />Prepared by: City Planner Thomas Paschke - 651-792-7074 | thomas.paschke@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />Attachments: Conceptual site plan <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />