Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3.0 5T AFF COMMENT <br /> <br />3.1 In reviewing this request, staff made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. Section 1004.02(D) requires a minimum lot width of 85 feet and a minimum lot <br />area of 11,000 square feet for interior lots in an R-1 zoning district. As proposed, <br />Parcel A will have a lot width of 64.30 feet with a lot area of 19,163 square feet and <br />Parcel B will have a lot width of 64.01 feet with a lot area of 19,075 square feet. <br /> <br />2. There is a wide range of parcel size in this neighborhood, with lot areas ranging <br />from 10.140 square feet to 81,120 square feet and lot widths ranging from 65 feet <br />to 179 feet. Because of this variety, the proposed lot width and areas will be <br />compatible with the neighborhood. <br /> <br />3. Parcels of record (parcels created prior to May 21, 1959) are considered buildable <br />if the area and width are 70% of the requirements. The width of each of the <br />proposed lots is 75% of the current requirement of 85 feet and the area of each of <br />the proposed lots is 174% of the current requirement of 11,000 square feet. <br /> <br />4. Section 1004.02(D) also requires a side yard setback often feet for lots created after <br />May 21, 1959. The vast majority of parcels in this area have a five foot side yard <br />setback. as they were parcels of record as of May 21, 1959. A variance to reduce the <br />side yard setback to five feet in order to retain the existing side yard setbacks will <br />be consistent with the rest of the neighborhood. A five foot side yard setback will <br />also facilitate development of the site in accordance with the plans submitted, <br />including a detached two car garage behind each house. <br /> <br />5. The home on this parcel was identified as a potential candidate for the City's <br />housing replacement program. The proposed variances and lot split will allow the <br />property to be developed privately in support of the City's housing replacement <br />program and livable community goals without any public subsidy. <br /> <br />6. The proposed variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the <br />City's Comprehensive Plan and Title 10 ofthe City Code (Zoning). The front yard <br />setbacks of the proposed building pads will be in line with other houses in the <br />neighborhood, the buildings will be similar in mass and scale to other homes in the <br />neighborhood, and the redevelopment of the site meets the City's livable <br />community goals. <br /> <br />7. The proposed variance, if granted, will not adversely affect the public health, safety, <br />or general welfare, provided standards/conditions are attached to insure that <br />redevelopment of the site is completed in accordance with the plans proposed by <br />the applicant. <br /> <br />4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />PF3075 - RPCA (11/18/98) - Page 3 of 4 <br />