Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-;- <br /> <br />t <br />~, <br /> <br />'-1'~ -9\ <br /> <br />Date: April 3, 1999 <br /> <br />To: Property owners adjacent to 1944 Lexington Avenue North <br /> <br />From: Lois 1. Olson, Property owner of 1944 Lexington Avenue North <br /> <br />Regarding: <br /> <br />Response to concerns associated with Planning File #3077, expressed at the March <br />10, 1999 Meeting of the Roseville Planning Commission <br /> <br />In keeping with the request of the Roseville Planning Commission, we have had numerous <br />conversations with members of the City of Roseville Planning staff and adjacent residents to our <br />property. We have listened to comments, suggestions and concerns expressed by all parties involved. <br />We have listed below, those issues raised by the adjacent neighbors. While the list is quite lengthy, it <br />is nonetheless not intended to be all inclusive but rather our recollection of the issues brought forth at <br />the Roseville Planning Commission Meeting of March 10, 1999 as well as conversations with the <br />neighbors. The following list is not necessarily in order of importance as expressed by the neighbors. <br />We have modified the Planned Unit Development(PUO) plans to incorporate the requested changes in <br />order to eliminate the concerns expressed. These modifications are being offered in good faith with the <br />understanding that we will initiate our PUD subject to approval of the Planning Commission and the <br />City Council. We have made the alterations as suggested by the Planning Commission. We have <br />modified the plan to incorporate the issues expressed by the neighbors. Those items designated by an <br />asterisk (*) have been addressed in the modified site development plan, Edition #9, March 29, 1999. <br />Those items designated by a pound sign(#) have previously been addressed in the March 10, 1999 <br />PUD, Planning File #3077. <br /> <br />NEIGHBOR'S COMMENTS <br /> <br />1. The turret or tower is too high. * <br /> <br />2. The lights in the turret/tower will shine into the neighbor's homes. * <br /> <br />3. The current green areas are being replaced with building and asphalt. * <br /> <br />4. The three foot setback on the east is too close to our property. * <br /> <br />5. The joining of the new building with the current hardware store will result in: <br /> <br />A Lack of air circulation from the west* <br /> <br />B. An extended wall and resulting "strip mall" design* <br /> <br />6. Landscaping should not be completed on the Rose Villa property. * <br /> <br />7. There is too much building on a small property area. * <br /> <br />8. The proposed building is too close to the property lines. * <br />