Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br />.. <br /> <br />3. The neighborhood's defenses against all of the above problems are minimal. As one <br />resident described it, the fencing is porous, allowing lights to shine in living rooms <br />and noise to permeate everywhere. Har-Mar talked several times about the 60 foot <br />required green space around the property. The green space closest to us is at most <br />25 feet between the edge of Pascal Street and the parking spaces just beyond the <br />fence. Is Har-Mar in compliance with the city ordinances or are they just <br />misinformed? Do streets and parking count as "green"? How will the increased <br />traffic conform to the City's noise ordinance? And how will that be enforced with a 24 <br />hour operation? No answers have been offered. <br /> <br />4. Questions of security were brushed off. It seems only logical that the owners and <br />operators should have definitive plans in place for added Har-Mar security and off <br />duty police long before Cub would open, yet they don't. <br /> <br />We believe that, at a minimum, a much more secluded location (far away from the <br />neighborhood) for the loading docks should be found; traffic should be restricted (no <br />trucks) or eliminated altogether aiong the east, south and west perimeters (those of the <br />neighborhood); and that the hours of operation for Cub and for snow plowing and <br />removal should be restricted to those of the rest of the Har-Mar tenants. <br /> <br />Although a grocery close to us may be convenient for some, we strongly believe the <br />addition of Cub provides a net loss to the integrity of the neighborhood. We will suffer <br />significantly more noise, air pollution, litter, traffic and danger (both from crime and <br />congestion). In addition, we loose the Farmer's Market in the summer and the State Fair <br />transportation in the fall. Add to this a summer of dirty, noisy construction and there is <br />nothing at all "friendly" about this proposal. <br /> <br />It is deeply disappointing, though not unexpected, that the Bradley Partnership would <br />gravely endanger the quality of life in this neighborhood for greed. Certainly a more <br />neighborhood friendly option could be found, especially since it was admitted at the <br />meeting that the theatres were interested in the existing Home Place space. <br /> <br />If a Cub expansion is inevitable, then we can only hope that a full and through <br />environmental impact study will be performed to address the problems detailed above. <br /> <br />Thank you for your attention to these concerns, and please feel free to contact us if any <br />points are unclear. <br /> <br />Sincerely yours, <br /> <br />~M.rdu <br /> <br />Bruce M. Weber <br /> <br />~~L-- \:::. W.J ~ <br /> <br />Sandra K. Weber <br /> <br />Also sent to: <br />Mr. Steve Sarcozy, City Manager <br />Mr. Dan Wall, Mayor <br />Mr. Karl Keel, Public Works Director <br />Mr. Dennis Welsch, Commercial Development Director <br />Members of the City Council <br />