pf_03111 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4 ( CASE NUMBER: 1034-77 January 5, 1977 (, Page Two percent of the area of the building facing the street we approximate to be 189 square feet. 5. It would appear to us that the proposal to construct the pylon is consistent with other variances allowed on the west side of Long Lake Road. The more offensive sign in our opinion, is the 342 square foot sign (Sign "All) attached to the building itself. It would appear that if a pylon sign is to be allowed to be visible from the free\'iay, it is not necessary to have another sign on the building serving the same function. The Planning Commission may wish to consider approval of the pylon sign with the condition that the 342 square foot sign be brought into conformance with the ordinance. This would allow for a sign of approximately 100 square feet which will be quite adequate to identify the business from Partridge Road. 6. Another part of the problem is that Mr. Trapp has not repainted the structures as p~oposed and as a condition attached to his previous approval for the construction of gasoline service statlon facilities~ Mr. Trapp indicates that he intends to do this in the spring of the year. We suggest any approvals include a condition that all of the signs proposed to be removed, be so removed prior to the construction of any additional signs under this request. In addition, it should be stipulated that all previous conditions from the previous approval be accomplished no later than June 1, 1977. 7. Again, it would be helpful if members of the Planning COlTlT1ission and Council could view the site prior to the public hearing on this request.