Laserfiche WebLink
<br />". <br /> <br />Jolm A Bibeau, Jr. <br />Dia.na L. Bibeau. <br />2065 William Street <br />Roseville,lvIf./ 55113 <br />(651)487-2188 <br /> <br />Thoma,:> R. Paschke <br />City Planner . <br />City of Rose vi lie <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville,!\1N 55113 <br /> <br />RE: Kitchen expansion into the 11'ont yard setback art'a. <br /> <br />Dear 1'v1r. Paschke: <br /> <br />We recently received a letter fi"OIIl you dated March 3, 1999. Thank you for your <br />preliminm-y r~view of our plans and property. W'e 3t.~ excited 81ld encouraged by the <br />possibility of obtaining a Setback P,,,rnllt fi'om Roseville. <br /> <br />Enclosed please find a completed application, a check in the amount 0[$25.00, and 2 <br />copies of our plans as YOII requested. <br /> <br />TIle reason \ve are seeking this permit is due to ollr small kitchen eating space. We <br />currently have 5 people in our family and a table for 4. The kitchen is an "eat-in" style. <br />and there is no room for a dining room. We spend most of our awake time in the kitchen. <br />eating and doing art projects with the children. We have a nice size lot 77' by 176'. 'TI1e <br />location is very convenient to the city, shopping, and parks. We especially like the ne\...' <br />waJking path around Lake McCan'ons. <br /> <br />Many ofth~ homes in our area are larger than ours and have been updated or remodeled <br />and added on to. We feel that this remodel would increase our property value and our <br />neighbor's property. We will be hiring professionals to do most of the work, though John <br />is very handy and will assist in the project completion. <br /> <br />In response to item #9, there are no alternatives to expanding the kitchen without this <br />pelTIlit. The kitchen is located in the front ofthe house and the rest ofthe housE;' is being <br />used for bedroom, living space, and storage, In response to item #10, all of the <br />specifications circled on the application apply to us: we have a one car garage located on <br />the site, the proposed project improves and design and livability of oW" home, the originaJ <br />reason for the setback permit was not created by the current owner, the existing <br />improvements along with proposed improvement retain a. minimum of 70% of the <br />pervious surtace and green space ofthe lot, the proposed project creates no other setback <br />or variance conditions, the proposed project improves the functional use ofthe site, the <br />proposed pr~iect uses the same e},,1erior structure materials and colors (we plan to put on <br /> <br />V' <br />