pf_03119 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Jan Vanderwall noted that the five phase process was part of the original charge. By stopping, do we lose some of the momentum? Pat Johnson agreed that momentum is important and meetings with the public should continue. The phases of the Charge are: Phase l(a) Phase I (b) Phase l(c) Phase 1 (d) Site Assessment Baseline Data Public participation City Center Vision Phase 2 Development Analyses Phase 3 Develop Master Plan Alternatives Phase 4 Master Plan Formulation Phase 5 Documentation Chair Wietecki asked staff to prepare the documentation on existing conditions. Staff had asked that a vision be created first, then tested against the existing conditions. Chair Wietecki noted the conditions of Park and Recreation buildings are inadequate for today's operating conditions. The next step should be to record the economic, operations, conditions and functional condition of the city buildings. Chair Wietecki suggested a standard recording format for each of the city facilities. The school facilities should also be documented. Pat Johnson asked if the meeting notes could be used for background. Jan Vander.vall asked if staff could bring together a summary of background data and combine it with pictures of the sites. Don Anderson noted that the Park and Recreation Committee did document the need for new facilities in 1995-1996. Lois Sinn Lindquist noted that original input was to be easily accessible reaction from citizens and interest groups, not necessarily a set of hearings. Focus groups may sell the process and add momentum, while giving the Task Force confirmation of direction. Chair Keith Wietecki suggested interest groups be invited in May. Peggy Egli suggested a brief overview to be sent with invitations to the interest groups for the Page 2 of 3