pf_03119 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Chair Wietecki asked Dennis Welsch to return with a plan for public input process. 7. Public Comment: Dick Houck said people misunderstood when the CCTF took an aggressive position with the Planning Cornmission. The CCTF charge includes a report to the Council and the residents. The project recommendation should include costs that the Council can ask for approvaJ in a referendum. The phase 2 planning process is the right way to go, A general discussion of the Planning Commission report process ensued, ' Carla Miller, Avon Street, asked for clarification regarding Howard Johnson Park and the VFW. She explained the confusion over the issues, Wendell Brown, Griggs Street, challenged the CCfF to keep the boundaries as shown on the agenda card - do not confine the site, The Howard Johnson Park could use more improvements including a picnic shelter, Establish priorities, Where can the City move the Public Works Department? Bill Lansky, Dellwood Street, expressed concern about the use of parks for City Center. Divert traffic to Lexington and County Road C. Why must the city do anything? The people who attend meetings are the residents who care. Try ,to keep neighborhoods quiet, peaceful and green. Agun range would be desirable. One plan alternative could be to do nothing. John Kysylyczyn, Victoria Street, expressed concern for costs; thanked the CCTF for time and effort. The Focus is the newspaper for the City. He described that parkland on Fernwood and Roselawn, and at Lexington and B where buildings may be or are constructed. The mistrust issue relates to past projects such as the Oval and the Council. Scott Berg noted the CCTF should be moving aggressively forward, A resident said the CCfF planning process should include a traffic congestion study. The Planning Commission suggested more input. She recommended a city center not all in one area to reduce congestion. 8. Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p,m. Q:\CITYCENf\T ASK FORCE NOTES_07.01,99.doc Page 4 of 4