Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES <br />OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILlE <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />*' <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 29th day of June 1999, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />Council Member <br /> <br />introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />Resolution No. <br />Resolution Denying a 32 Foot Wide Driveway Access Point (apron) And a Five (5) <br />Foot Side Yard Driveway Setback Variance at 2687 Woodbridge Street <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 703.04B(I)a of the Roseville City Code states: For single family and <br />duplex principal structure within R-l or R- 2 Zones, the maximum width of any driveway at the <br />property line shall be 26 feet; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 703.04B(9) states: Residential driveway shall be constructed so that <br />the edge of the driveway nearest the side lot line shall be a minimum of five (5) feet from the side <br />lot line; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Michael Davis, property owner, (hereinafter "applicant") of the lot at 2687 <br />Woodbridge Street, has applied for a variance to allow a 32 foot wide driveway access point <br />(apron) within the city right-of-way and a five (5) foot side yard driveway setback variance that <br />would enable Mr. Davis to retain his driveway and street access (apron) in its current location; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The City's Pavement Management Program and the reconstruction of <br />Woodbridge Street have prompted the variance request; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the request <br />on Wednesday, June 9, 1999, and recommended (6-0) (5-1) denial of the requested variances; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation on Tuesday, June 29, 1999; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. Section 1013.02 requires the applicant to demonstrate a physical hardship and to demonstrate <br />that no practical alternatives exist that would reduce the need for a variance. <br /> <br />Resolution _ - Page 1 of 3 <br />