pf_03126 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF ROSEVlllE * * * * * * * * * * * * * Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 29th day of June 1999, at 6:30 p.m. The following members were present:~astel, Wiski, Maschka and the following were absent: Goedeke, Wall Council Member Maschka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution No. 9663 Resolution Denying a 32 Foot Wide Driveway Access Point (apron) And 8 -fi,-~5) "f~et Sidt: Yard Dri\'e\WI}' Setback Variance at 2687 Woodbridge Street WHEREAS, Section 703.04B(I)a ofthe Roseville City Code states: For single family and duplex principal structure within R-l or R-2 Zones, the maximum width of any driveway at the property line shall be 26 feet; and WHEREAS, Section 703.04B(9) states: Residential driveway shall be constructed so that the edge of the driveway nearest the side lot line shall be a minimum of five (5) feet from the side lot line; and WHEREAS, Michael Davis, property owner, (hereinafter "applicant") of the lot at 2687 Woodbridge Street, has applied for a variance to allow a 32 foot wide driveway access point (apron) within the city right-of-way and a fl~e (::;) foot side yard dri\>e"vay ::;elbadt vatlanee that would enable Mr. Davis to retain his driveway and street access (apron) in its current location; and WHEREAS, The City's Pavement Management Program and the reconstruction of Woodbridge Street have prompted the variance request; and WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the request on Wednesday, June 9, 1999, and recommended (6-0) (5-1) denial ofthe requested variances; and WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's recommendation on Tuesday, June 29, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: 1. Section 1013.02 requires the applicant to demonstrate a physical hardship and to demonstrate that no practical alternatives exist that would reduce the need for a variance.