pf_03140 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1016.22 .J meet the setback, height, and other requirements of Sections 1016.14 through 1016.16. Any deviation from these requirements may only be au- thorized by a variance pursuant to Section 1016.20. C. Deck Additions: Deck additions may be allowed, without a variance, to a structure which does not meet the required setback from the ordinary high water level, if all of the f~ criteria and standards are mef: -=- . "~. - "'.. 1. The structure existed prior to the date the City's original shoreland structure setbacks were established on March 27, 1974. '2. A thorough evaluation of the prop- erty and structure reveals no reason- able location for a deck meeting or exceeding the existing ordinary high water level setback of the structure. 3. The ~w deck encro.sc.b.ment t2.- ~ard the ordinam higfJ. water J~~I ~o~~ not e~ed fl tee",Il.Q.~Jcent(15~ ~, existrng seffiack of "the,~~ru,c.t~re from tfle'ordlna'..' tllh water level or oesn()t encroach closer tan,," y eet "3'0 , w Ichever is more restd&- TI'Ve;ana medecK shall be constructed ormaterials similar to the materials of the principal structure, wood, or e,arth tone; and the new deck shall not be roofed or screened. D. Existing Decks: Existing decks, at the date of adoption of this Chapter, which meet the required setbacks and have had valid building permits, may be enclosed as part of the structure. Deck extensions beyond and from a nonconforming, enclosed deck which would increase the nonconforming 1295 City of Roseville 1016.23 setback, shall not be permitted. (Ord. 1156,12-12-94) 1016.23: SUBDIVISIONIPLATTING PRO. VISIONS: Land Suitability: Each lot created through subdivision, including planned unit developments authorized under Chapter 1008 of this Title and Section 1016.24 of this Chapter, shall be suit- able for the proposed use as defined by the suitability analysis. Suitability analysis shall consider susceptibility to flooding, existence of wetlands, soil and rock formations with severe limi- tations for development, severe ero- sion potential, steep. topography, availability of City sewer and water, near-shore aquatic conditions unsuit- able for water-based recreation, im- portant fish and wildlife habitat, pres- ence of significant historic sites, or any other feature of the natural land likely to be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of future residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. B. Consistency With Other Controls: Subdivisions shall conform to all offi- cial controls of this community. A subdivision shall not be approved where a later variance from one or more standards in official controls would be needed to use the lots for their intended purpose. Each lot shall meet the minimum lot size and dimen- sional requirements of Sections 1016.14 through 1016.16. C: Information Requirements: Sufficient information shall be submitted by the applicant for the community to make a determination of land suitability. The . . . .. .