Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />} <br />1 <br /> <br />Table 22-1 <br />Trip Generation for Previous and Current Centre Pointe Business Park Concepts <br /> <br />Centre Pointe Development Scenario Trip Generation <br />Daily PM Peak Hour <br />Development Approved in 1997 7389 788 <br />Development Approved in February 2000 6446 802 <br />Current Development Proposal 6735 883 <br /> <br />) <br />1 <br /> <br />The p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were developed for five signalized intersections <br />and five unsignalized intersections. The five signalized intersections examined are: <br />· Cleveland A venue / County Road C <br />· Cleveland Avenue / Northbound 1-35 Ramps <br />· Cleveland A venue / County Road D <br />· Northbound I-35 Ramps / County Road D <br />· Southbound 1-35 Ramps / County Road D <br /> <br />The five unsignalized intersections are located on Cleveland Avenue and provide stop <br />sign control for the approaches to Cleveland Avenue. Traffic on Cleveland Avenue <br />does not stop at these intersections. The five unsignalized intersections examined are: <br />· Veritas Way / Cleveland Avenue <br />· County Road C2 (South Centre Pointe Drive) / Cleveland Avenue <br />· Lydia Avenue / Cleveland Avenue <br />· Brenner Avenue / Cleveland Avenue <br />· North Centre Pointe Drive / Cleveland Avenue <br /> <br />Because the Centre Pointe development will be completed in 2003, traffic forecasts <br />and analyses were completed for 2004. The weekday p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts <br />were developed for the following three development scenarios: <br />· 2004 with development approved in 1997 <br />· 2004 with development approved in February 2000 <br />· 2004 with current proposed development <br /> <br />j <br />J <br />J <br /> <br />Traffic forecasts for the above 2004 scenarios are based on 2001 p.m. peak hour <br />background traffic volumes estimated in 1997 by the BR W firm for the Centre Pointe <br />EA W. The 2001 volumes were then adjusted to 2004 p.m. peak hour volume levels <br />and account for the following changes in traffic conditions between 2001 and 2004: <br />· Background traffic growth at 2% per year <br />· Construction of Twin Lakes Parkway in 2002/2003 <br />· Portions of the Twin Lakes development anticipated being complete by 2003. <br /> <br />Page 22 <br />