Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City ofRoseville - Planning Commission <br /> <br />Page 6 of 10 <br /> <br />Ed Sukoff asked for details of the need for a swimming pool/cabana and parking lot. An addition to the <br />building of less than 10% would not require an amendment. He recommended that future <br />improvements be discussed at this meeting. <br /> <br />Joe Olson asked for details of the size and location of the building and future improvements. Mr. Olson <br />asked for details of the difference in building footprints; 17,000 s,f. versus 32,000 s.f.. There was <br />general discussion regarding the site. Can the city attach conditions? (yes). <br /> <br />Ray Harrington, 1990 Midland Hills, stated when the Club House was built in 1963 there was a concern <br />about the impact of chlorine in the pool on asthma conditions of nearby residents. Could the building <br />design be reversed to put the pool on the west? <br /> <br />Cathy Coughan, 1961 Midland Hills, expressed concern about future improvements. She described the <br />neighborhood meeting held on January 9, 2000, The neighbors prepared a letter, dated January 12, <br />2000, explaining their concerns (23 residential properties), as attached to these minutes, <br /> <br />Christine Rogers, Draper Avenue, expressed concerns about parties, noise, car alarms, placement of <br />the poolo size of the building, banquet room for parties and weddings. She recommended reversing the <br />building to put the pool on the west side. The loading areas are a concern. The architect described the <br />enclosed loading area. <br /> <br />John Rogers, Draper Avenue, expressed concern regarding the banquet area adjacent to the <br />residential neighborhood. <br /> <br />G.B. Morris, Draper Avenue, said the Country Club is a noise generator from the patio and parking lot. <br />The banquet hall will be 160 feet closer to the residents. The future plans are a concern; all future <br />amendments "must" involve the neighborhood (rather than wording "may"). The trees and berms <br />should be constructed now, <br /> <br />Joe Olson, Draper Avenue, expressed concern about swimming pool and noise, The building is double <br />the banquet space and will create problems. The current patio noise goes to the north and northeast, <br />now it will be aimed to the east. He recommended moving the building or redesigning it. He <br />recommended sending the design back to the architect and staff. He suggested a neighborhood <br />meeting be held. <br /> <br />Ed Sukhoff recommended that: 1) a new ordinance prohibiting patio and open cash bar; 2) a new <br />ordinance regarding distance and obstacles for a pool, 3) all screening must be complete at the time of <br />planting. <br /> <br />Ward Shendell, N. Rosewood Lane, expressed concern with the noise and the difficulty to discuss with <br />neighbors. <br /> <br />Mrs. Sukhoff noted that delivery was on the west side, now proposed on the southeast; she <br />recommended denial of the proposal. <br /> <br />K. Jane Chow, Rosewood Lane, expressed concern regarding noise and the need for more screening. <br /> <br />There being no further public comment, Chair Klausing closed the hearing and described the issues. <br /> <br />Member Rhody requested final landscape plans; a plan for future expansion; impacts of relocated truck <br />dock; positioning of patio for reduced impact on resident; and, further that this matter be continued for <br />one month. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Rhody moved, seconded by Member Wilke, to continue the request by Midland Hills <br />Country Club for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a 32,325 square foot clubhouse <br /> <br />http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/pmOOOI12.htm <br /> <br />11/03/2000 <br />