My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0908
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0908
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2014 9:46:27 AM
Creation date
9/24/2014 9:44:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/8/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 8, 2014 <br /> Page 8 <br /> over a period of years; and noted it would be consistent with the policy just <br /> adopted by the City Council. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Miller confirmed that the approx- <br /> imately dollars available, based on the August 25, 2014 discussion, would be ap- <br /> proximately$400,000 in aggregate to get to the high point range. <br /> Councilmember Willmus expressed his confusion in tracking inflation between <br /> Attachment A ($48,870) and the e-mail sent out earlier today showing $41,800; <br /> and asked if there was an increase in materials and supplies, of just allocated dif- <br /> ferently. <br /> Mr. Miller advised that he would need to track the approximate $7,000 difference <br /> from several different categories before responding. <br /> Referencing his budget proposal reconciliation for tax-supported funds (version 1- <br /> 9/8/14) Mayor Roe addressed the changes made since the August 25, 2014 dis- <br /> cussion with notes moved to the side for easier tracking; and emphasis under <br /> property tax relief notes for City Council discretion and three options according to <br /> policy. Mayor Roe advised that the 2013 numbers had also been included for av- <br /> erage and high-end aggregate reserves as requested. Mayor Roe advised that he <br /> took editorial license and made several substantive changes, including: Parks & <br /> Recreation Department re-accreditation as a one-time cost from 2014 and created <br /> an aggregate number of $15,000 separated from Finance Director Miller's num- <br /> ber, which could be shown as a real number as available. Under line S5, Mayor <br /> Roe advised that he removed labor costs for the Fire Relief Association, and in <br /> line S7, under"reduced levy"to "no levy"versus Mr. Miller's most recent e-mail. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that he provided more specificity in the notes as to where the <br /> numbers originated, and left placeholders for unknown numbers and/or infor- <br /> mation at this time, but that should be incorporated into this type of report in the <br /> future. In terms of budget numbers, Mayor Roe clarified that this report was spe- <br /> cific to the operating fund, and included no capital items. As pointed out by Mr. <br /> Miller, Mayor Roe noted that those CIP items fluctuated and while the budget <br /> changed, it would be easier to track CIP number more consistently in another <br /> format versus this report for annual operating costs. <br /> Councilmember Etten expressed his frustration in tracking numbers between <br /> staff's Attachment A, including the use of reserves for the General Fund (at <br /> $346,000) and the number established in a previous meeting (at $321,000), sepa- <br /> rating out the Recreation Fund. However, in the e-mail from Mr. Miller, Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten noted that it showed $346,000 plus $30,000; and questioned if <br /> that had been corrected yet. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that it was included in that number. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.