My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0908
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0908
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2014 9:46:27 AM
Creation date
9/24/2014 9:44:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/8/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 8, 2014 <br /> Page 9 <br /> Councilmember Etten opined that Attachment A should be accurate, and he found <br /> no reason for the yellow highlighting, which he found more confusion. Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten also noted a new line item for the Contingency Fund and asked <br /> for an explanation. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon advised that the Contingency Fund was created specific <br /> to Fire Department personnel costs, and was included in the revised worksheet <br /> sent out Friday. <br /> Mayor Roe questioned if this was added into increased costs for labor previously <br /> established at $69,000 for the reorganization. <br /> Mr. Miller clarified that the net cost for the Fire Department reorganization and <br /> hiring of 5 to 6 new full-time firefighters would be $69,000, including an offset in <br /> reductions for wages in part-time firefighters. However, Mr. Miller advised of the <br /> need to set aside money for other potential impacts resulting from possible union- <br /> ization of the department, which remained an unknown at this time, but represent- <br /> ed a significant cost depending on that direction, with approximately $32,000 set <br /> aside for that purpose. Mr. Miller noted that there was no need to park dollars for <br /> that purpose, however, staff was making that recommendation in anticipation of <br /> the need. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Etten, Mr. Miller opined that the $32,000 was <br /> most likely included in the COLA adjustment previously, but as the City Council <br /> requested additional categories and increased transparency, staff had segregated <br /> out some of those specific costs. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that it made sense to segregate that, and with the $212,000 re- <br /> maining in COLA, it did track; noting that the notes in the document previously <br /> referenced would call that out. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, City Manager Trudgeon advised that, <br /> if the City Council wanted to provide tax relief this year, it could use some or all <br /> of the approximately $453,000 high range in reserves above staff's original rec- <br /> ommendation; however, he reiterated staff's desire to make the reserves whole <br /> moving forward by refunding the amount used for the 2014 budget, and commit- <br /> ment made at that time to replenish those reserves during the 2015 budget cycle. <br /> If the City Council chose to scale back reserve payback, City Manage Trudgeon <br /> suggested a clear timetable to pay it back, whether over a two or three year peri- <br /> od, but providing specifics to do so; and to clearly understand reserves not be <br /> used consistently on an annual basis simply to avoid raising taxes, providing for <br /> an unsustainable practice. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.