Laserfiche WebLink
<br />REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> <br />Ite Description: <br /> <br />DATE: 04/12/00 <br />ITEM NO: 6C <br /> <br />Agenda Section: <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br /> <br />Second Reading: Ordinance modifications regarding Metropolitan <br />Council Plan Review of Roseville Comprehensive Plan (PF3174) <br /> <br />Manager Approved: <br /> <br /> <br />1.0 BACKGROUND <br /> <br />1.1 Previously, City staff met with the Metropolitan Council staff to determine what <br />other surface water and sanitary sewer issues might be necessary for the final <br />review and approval of the 1998 Roseville Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />1.2 Staff prepared new technical information that was requested, but noted that it was <br />impossible for the city to rewrite the surface water management plan until the <br />three watershed organizations (Rice Creek, Capital, and Grass Lake) complete <br />their plans. The staff requested an alternative approach in which the City agrees to <br />adopt a resolution stating that within 120 days after Metropolitan Council <br />approval, the City would adopt an ordinance amending the City Code, Section <br />1016.26 (Storm Water Management). The amendment would state explicitly that <br />the City will use National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards, Minnesota <br />Pollution Control Agency (MnPCA) Urban Best Management Practices, and the <br />established standards of the water management organization having jurisdiction <br />over the specific project. The first reading was held on November 22, 1999. <br /> <br />1.4 The amendment states that the City would require all new residential <br />developments of more than five acres to meet storm water ponding and quality <br />standards. (This applies to developments of more than 20 acres in the current <br />code.) <br /> <br />1.5 Finally, the new amendment would require property owners of new developments <br />to inspect storm water facilities for proper functioning one year after construction <br />and ensure they are working properly and see that they are cleaned/repaired on a <br />five-year interval. <br /> <br />1.6 The Metropolitan Council approved Roseville's Comprehensive Plan in January <br />2000. However, the City needs to follow through on bringing the ordinance <br />forward to the Planning Commission and the City Council. <br /> <br />1.7 The City Attorney prepared the necessary ordinance amendment to Chapter <br />1016.26 of the City Code (see attachment). <br /> <br />PF3174 - RPCA (041200) Page 1 of2 <br />