Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville, MN - Official Website <br />the current Commission, allowing the public to see annually what was being appropriated to the Park <br />Board. Chair Holt assured Councilmembers that their recommendation was not intended as acontrol <br />issue, but simply to make things more transparent to the public, with the control obviously remaining <br />at the City Council level, with the Park Board focused on maintaining that essential service that was <br />valued by all. <br />Councilmember Laliberte stated that she didn't disagree with the transparency issue; but with <br />previous engagement issues, she remained concerned that some decision-making would be made at <br />the Park Board level with an empty room versus a more publicly perceived City Council meeting. <br />Councilmember Laliberte advised that she needed to make that connection even though she wasn?t <br />confident all the engagement and communication components had been addressed sufficiently. <br />Specific to their research about a Park Board, Commissioner Doneen noted that they varied <br />throughout the state, along with their duties which were established by the City Council, and asked <br />that this be given consideration as well, if there were specific concerns or aspects that the City <br />Council wanted to remain involved in. Commissioner Doneen noted that it wasn?t a ?one fits all? <br />aspect for aPark Board, and the City Council could decide what was needed and which areas would <br />be more of a focus of the Park Board or for the City Council. <br />Councilmember McGehee expressed appreciation of the Commission?s work and expressed <br />understanding of the transparency issue; reiterating her support for a referendum on this and <br />ultimate disappointment that it was not done. Councilmember McGehee stated that she saw that as <br />an important engagement tool to educate the public before they went to the polls, similar to the City <br />Hall/Public WorksBuilding referendum, with changes made to the original plan as part of that <br />process, and openly discussed as part of the "People's City Hall." Councilmember McGehee <br />expressed her strong support of that process, but was unsure how to fit that into the operation of a <br />Park Board. From her perspective with large expenditures of public funds, Councilmember McGehee <br />opined that it was critical to have a referendum to engage citizens and their opportunity to weigh in <br />later. <br />Mayor Roe noted that a referendum was required and clearly outlined by state statute for bonding in <br />some circumstances, and that was the determining factor, and referendums were not based on the <br />amount of money proposed to be spent. <br />Specific to establishment of a Park Board, Mayor Roe opined that it could solve things; but <br />consideration of a community center was a specific project and there were ways available to solve <br />funding issues without a Park Board. <br />In conclusion, Mayor Roe suggested discussion continue at the next joint meeting, with the <br />consensus of the City Council to schedule joint meetings quarterly. <br />Recess <br />Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 8:45 p.m. and reconvened at approximately 8:48 p.m. <br />c.Receive Community Survey Results <br />Communications Manager Garry Bowman provided summary results of the community survey <br />conducted in April of 2014, and as detailed in the RCA dated June 9, 2014. Mr. Bowmannoted that <br />this was a scientific telephone survey of 400 Roseville residents, divided into four quadrants: north or <br />south of Highway 36 and east or west of Snelling Avenue. Mr. Bowman noted that those delineations <br />may have somewhat skewed results due to heavier residential and/or commercial areas. Mr. <br />Bowman advised that the demographic and age mix of the survey closely matched the 2010 census. <br />Mr. Bowman presented the key survey takeaways, with the presentationMr. Bowman advised that, if <br />interested, the Morris Leatherman firm would be happy to do a complete review of the survey as an <br />alternative ?brown bag? lunch for staff, the City Council and interested members of the public; or at <br />a future City Council meeting at the discretion of the City Council. Mr. Bowman advised that the firm <br />would be providing an Executive Summary within the next few months that would further analyze <br />results. <br />Willmus moved, Laliberte seconded, TABLING this discussion for a future City Council Work session. <br />CouncilmemberWillmus began to move to table this discussion to a future City Council work session. <br />Atthe request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Bowman advised that he was preparing a news <br />release with attachments for Tuesday morning, June 10, 2014 for the City's website and other <br />sources. <br />http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/Archive.aspx?AMID=&Type=&ADID=1785&PREVIEW=YES <br /> <br />