Laserfiche WebLink
<br />restaurant, and an additional hotel. The development changes differ ITom the estimates <br />within the BRW study by the following amounts: <br />. The proposed development has increased by 52,973 square feet compared to the <br />BRWevaluation. This is an increase of8.5%. <br />. The proposed development is expected to generate 6,823 daily trips. This represents <br />a decrease of 566 trips per day ITom the BRW estimates for a decrease of7.7%. <br />. The proposed development is expected to generate 824 PM peak hqur trips. This <br />represents an increase of36 trips during the PM peak hour ITom the BRW estimates <br />for an increase of4.6%. <br /> <br />The BRW study volumes were u~ed as the base line to measure the antiCipated imp~cts <br />ttomincreased traffic associated with the development along this section of Cleveland <br />Avenue. Theu-study finding was, "there are expected to'be no significant traffic impacts <br />associated with the proposed CentrePointe development. The minor impacts identified <br />in this analysis are attributed to background conditions and would be expected to occur <br />with or without the Centre Pointe development." <br /> <br />Since the propOsed Centre Pointe Business Park development is expected to generate <br />slightly more PM peak hour traffic than was estimated by BRW for this site, it is <br />anticipated that t~e operation of the surrounding intersections not change.. <br /> <br />In conclusion, we offer the following: <br /> <br />. The proposed businesses are expected to gerierate slightly more traffic during the PM <br />peak hour, but less daily traffic, thantheBRW study had estimated and evaluated for <br />this site on Cleveland Avenue within their study. . <br />. It is anticipated that the proposed development will not adversely impact the . <br />, intersections in the area and they will operate within the ranges indicated by the BRW <br />report. <br /> <br />AirINoise Ouality <br />As part of the original EAW a study of potential impacts of vehicle related air and noise <br />emissions was contacted by Braun Intertec. Based on the above traffic analysis and the <br />reduced traffic volumes outlinedih the orig'inal EAW, RLK concludes that there will be <br />no adverse impact to the existing air and noise quality in the area. The MPCA will make <br />a final determination during the review of the ISP. <br /> <br />Stormwater ManagementlWetland Impacts.,. . . . <br />The proposed site will be developed with approximately 70% impervious surface. The <br />development of the site will be consistent with the original design data prepared byRLK <br />as part of the master grading and stormwater management. . .' . <br /> <br />The overall drainage patterns will be consistent with the original design calculations. . The <br />proposed design will collect stormwater discharge into an existing retention pond to the <br />