pf_03210 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: 3404262 1 Section 1016.22Al (Non-Conformities) stipulates that non-conformities can continue but are subject to applicable State Statutes and City Ordinance regarding alterations, repair after damage, discontinuance of use, and intensification of use. 2 The Shoreland Ordinance requires lots to have a width of 1 00 feet adjacent a shoreline and is 15,000 square feet in size. 3 The former home, initially constructed in 1910 prior to the establishment of the City of Roseville, is situated on a lot 40 feet in width and 167 feet in depth, encompassing 6,690 square feet 4 A variance requires the applicant to prove physical hardship and to demonstrate that no practical alternatives exist that would reduce the need for a variance. 5 The unique physical features of the property (i.e. shape and size of lot) create a physical hardship. 6 The hardship is not the applicant's creation. 7 The property cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the conditions permitted by the ordinance. 8 If granted, the variance will not impact the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") ofthe City of Roseville, Minnesota (the "City"), Ramsey County, Minnesota, that a variance to Section 1016.22Al (Non-Conformities) and Section 10 16.26B 1 (Storm Water Management) allowing redevelopment of the parcel with a single family home and allowance for 32% impervious land area for property at 391 Owasso Boulevard South (PID # 012923210005) be approved. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Mastel, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Mastel, Maschka, Wiski, Goedeke and Kysylyczyn and the following voted against the same: None WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ~J