Laserfiche WebLink
<br />trees. Plan 3 requires the removal of a small deciduous tree and a variance. <br /> <br />2.3 In review ofthe three plans, staff has determined Plan 3 provides the most practical <br />approach to solving access issues, while affording the least amount of loss to the existing <br />vegetation on the parcel. <br /> <br />2.4 Mr. Wieden seeks the variance to allow him to rectify a serious access issue along Dale <br />Street during the wintertime and allowing him to keep his mature trees. <br /> <br />2.5 Mr. Wieden will make the appropriate modifications to the existing driveway on the <br />south side of the lot to accommodate the new garage. Mr. Wieden will renovate the <br />existing garage adjacent Dale Street and will be required to remove the existing access <br />and driveway. <br /> <br />2.6 Applicable Code Requirements: <br /> <br /> Code Requirement Existin!! Condition Proposed Condition <br />Corner Side Yard Setback 30 feet 32 feet 11.5 feet <br />Parkin!! in ROW 20 feet 22/24 feet 11.5 feet <br />Impervious Coveraf!e 30% (3,945 s.D 24% (2,924 s.f.) 28% (3,422 s.fI <br /> <br />3.0 STAFF COMMENT <br /> <br />3.1 Variances may be granted where the strict enforcement of the literal provisions of the <br />ordinance would cause "undue hardship". The granting of a variance shall only occur <br />when it can be demonstrated that such an action will be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting a <br />variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the land owner is due to <br />circumstances unique to the property not created by the land owner, and the variance, if <br />granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Conditions may be attached <br />to a variance that mitigate the impacts on adjoining properties. <br /> <br />3.2 The Comprehensive Plan encourages reconstruction and upgrading of residential <br />structures (and neighborhood) throughout the community. Specifically, Section II <br />(Community Wide - General) and Section III (Residential) list Roseville's goals and <br />policies. (see attachment) <br /> <br />3.3 The City does not allow driveway access (slope) greater than 10%. Mr. Wieden's current <br />driveway slope is between 16% and 19%. Plan 2 would not eliminate or reduce the grade <br />of the slope. <br /> <br />3.4 The property is uniquely situated as a corner lot fronting Dale Street and Eldridge <br />Avenue. The garage and main access is off of Dale Street, while a secondary access was <br />installed along Eldridge A venue to deal with the complexities and safety of accessing <br />PF3211 - RPCA (051000) Page 2 of 3 <br />