pf_03224 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

supportive housing complex would generate 130 vehicle trips per day, with an a.m. peak hour of 11 vehicles and a p.m. peak hour of 13 vehicles. It is anticipated that 50% of the traffic would southbound, 30% northbound, and the remainder split east and west along Roselawn Avenue (see attached consultant review). 7.9 Dedication ofland for right-of-ways and any pond easement required by the Watershed must occur prior to the issuance of building permits. 7.10 Because this will be a new plat, the City staff is in the process of determining whether park dedication will be required for this development, to be determined as part of the final approval process. 8.0 DETAILED STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City staff believes this project is consistent with the direction provided by the Comprehensive Plan and the Vista 2000 report, which encourages housing diversity and mixed- use neighborhood revitalization. The staff has recommended the Planning Commission and Council take the following action regarding the request by ASI and VSI Construction, subject to conditions listed in Section 7 of this project report. 9.0 PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION: 9.1 On February 6, 2002, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the ASINSI request. At the hearing, many of the adjacent/neighborhood residents spoke in favor of the mixed-use redevelopment proposal. These residents supported the location (setback) of the structures from Lexington A venue and Roselawn Avenue; the building design, style, heights, and materials; the location ofthe on-site parking for both uses; and the conceptual screening, landscaping, and fencing. (A draft of the meeting minutes is attached.) 9.2 Three residents stated concern/opposition to certain aspects of the redevelopment proposal. However, two of the three indicated overall support for the project. The concern/opposition raised by two of the adjacent property owners were related to screening and structure location along the east property line. The third resident stated concern for the height of the supportive housing structure and its proximity to the property owner home directly to the east. 9.3 The Commission asked staff and the applicant a number of questions pertaining to setbacks, height, building materials, structure location, existing street right-of-way, landscaping and fencing (see attached minutes). 9.4 The Planning Commission recommended approval (6-0) of the ASINSI proposal including the Preliminary Plat; the General Concept Plan for a mixed-use planned unit development on the former Kath (Phillips 66) gas station site and the 2 adjoining parcels (4 total parcels); and the rezoning of the property from Bl, Limited Business District, B-2, Limited Retail District, and B-3, General Business District to Planned Unit Development with and underlying zoning ofB- 1, Limited Business and R-3 General Residence District PF3224 - RCA Accessible Space Concept Plan 030402 Page 9