Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br /> <br />Chair Duncan asked if the County has used a similar setback elsewhere. <br />Deb Bloom explained the right-of-way and utility placements. <br /> <br />Member Mulder explained his concern with the building with 140 feet of <br />frontage; it should have more vertical separation with materials and colors. <br />This should be similar to a small town community feeling. He said he <br />liked the overall design. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham reminded the developers of his concern, turning the <br />building to the southeast comer of the site. Had any design considerations <br />been looked at? Mike Cronin explained that the proposed design was the <br />most agreeable to the adjoining southeast neighbors. The pond as <br />proposed is in the lowest portion of the site. The exterior northeast comer <br />of the building has been redesigned to be set back further in the area <br />adjacent to Mr. Pawlek's site. New landscaping and fencing was also <br />designed in this area. The developer has also proposed new evergreens in <br />the southeast area along the property line. <br /> <br />Member Traynor asked for details of the setback from the right-of-way <br />lines. Deb Bloom explained that the long-term goal of the City Park and <br />Pathway System Plan is to have pathways on both sides of major streets <br />such as Lexington Avenue. Utilities are also within the street right-of- <br />way. Lexington Avenue right-of-way is 100 feet in width. <br /> <br />Dick Houk, Roselawn Avenue, asked for clarification of the business and <br />residential zoning. <br /> <br />Phil Fischer, Oxford Street, asked for clarification in residential zoning vs. <br />the comprehensive plan. (Staff will review and report.) <br /> <br />Ed Pawlek, Roselawn A venue, adjacent property owner, explained how <br />the proposal would impact his property (handed out a written response). <br />He did not object to the proposed use, but only to positioning on the site - <br />too close to his house. If the building were moved back 50 to 100 feet, it <br />would be better. <br /> <br />Carol Wagner, Autumn Street, said the proposal would be an attractive <br />addition to the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Paul Narum, Roselawn Avenue, owner of the second house east of the <br />site, sympathizes with the neighbor, Mr. Pawlek, but supports the project. <br /> <br />Dick Houk, Roselawn A venue, said the property is an ideal site for <br />development. He explained efforts of previous owners (Floyd Thompson, <br />Kath family, and Al Dunn of Ace's). This proposal is a good project, but <br />