Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Section of the Code to require a minimum driveway setback of five feet, in Single Family <br />Residential (R-l) platted areas, <br /> <br />3.2 Mr, Jenson's lot is 80 feet wide. Staff estimates that the existing house (with attached garage to <br />the east) is approximately 55 feet wide, with a 10 to 12 foot setback along the east property line, <br />An existing unpaved driveway now exists along the west side of the property, Based on staff <br />aerial photo estimates, the Jensen house sets between 11 to 13 feet from the west property line, <br />There are paved driveway spaces at the entrance to the previous attached garage and at the entry <br />(only) to the west side driveway, The house is currently being renovated and includes a 16' x 16' <br />family room on the north side and a 2 foot "pop-out" along the west wall of the house, making <br />the setback from the west property line even more narrow - especially as it relates to a new paved <br />driveway. <br /> <br />3.3 Mr, Jenson's parcel is approximately 18,880 square feet in size allowing him 5,664 square feet <br />(30%) of impervious area on the lot. Staff estimates the impervious area to be: 1,320 square feet <br />for the existing house; 256 square feet for the new addition; 784 square feet for the existing <br />detached garage; 2,500 square feet for the proposed driveway; 440 square feet for the existing <br />driveway; for a total of approximately 5,500 square feet. From the information provided, staff <br />has determined the proposal will not exceed the allowable impervious area amount. (A detailed <br />site plan is not available,) <br /> <br />3.4 The best estimate ofthe west side yard setback is 12 feet from the original wall ofthe house. The <br />variance application included a partial site plan with Mr. Jenson's proposal (but not a survey), <br />The site plan and construction plans do not tie into any specific property corner pin or property <br />line. The City policy is not to grant a variance without knowing specific site and setback <br />dimensions. <br /> <br />3,5 Mr. Jenson must validate his west property line and the existing and proposed amount of <br />impervious surface prior to any final variance approvals that may occur. <br /> <br />3,6 Because of the extreme length of the driveway (estimated at 190 feet as proposed), a paved <br />vehicle turn-around space adjacent to the detached garage should be required, This would add <br />more impervious space, The existing driveway along the east side of the property should then be <br />removed and replaced with landscaped (seeded/sodded) space prior to final inspection. <br /> <br />3.7 The adjoining neighbors have been notified ofthe proposed variance, At the printing of this <br />report, staff has not received any comments. The house directly to the west (and the most highly <br />impacted property) has been recently sold - that may be a reason why no response has been <br />received from the owner, <br /> <br />4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />4.1 While the conversion of the existing attached garage into expanded living space is consistent with <br />the City goal of reinvestment in residential property, Staff is hesitant to recommend approval of <br />the driveway to the detached garage at this time without clear plans. However, the staff does <br />recommend that the Commission use an outline of the following possible findings to determine <br />whether there is an "undue hardship" significant enough to recommend approval of a variance by <br />the City Council, perhaps subject to the plans being completed prior to Council consideration, <br /> <br />4,2 The physical hardship, defined as ... , was (was not) created by the applicant (Jenson) or existed <br />prior to the applicant... <br /> <br />PF3228 - RPCA (071200) Page 2 of 3 <br />