pf_03266 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Westerly 2439.05 feet, also except the Easterly 500 feet of West 2235.7 feet of Northerly 400 feet of said Northwest 1/4 of said Section 13, Township 29, Range 23, also except Easterly 100 feet of Westerly 1635.7 feet ofN. 400feet said Northwest 1/4 of said Section 13, Township 29, Range 23, also except Easterly 1200 feet of Westerly 1475.7 feet of Northerly 400feet of said Northwest 1/4 of siad Section 13, Rownship 29, Range 23, also except the Southerly 200 feet of the North 700 feet of West 400 feet of said Section 13, Township 29, Range 23, also except premises conveyed in "660" Deeds 65, "943" Deeds 141, "947" Deeds 145, "1098" Deeds 413, subject to rights of public in roads, (PIN: #132923240020); and WHEREAS, the Roberta Sladky lot is a pre-existing oddly shaped lot with a width of 48 feet along Lake McCarrons, a depth of approximately 350 feet, total lot size of approximately 15,550 square feet, and a private access to McCarrons Boulevard. A buildable pre-existing non- conforming lot of record must have a minimum lot width of 70 feet (70% of the standard 100 foot wide shoreland lot); and WHEREAS, Section 1016.16 (Structure Design Standards) requires structures to be set back a minimum of75 feet from the ordinary high watermark (OHW). The proposed replacement of the former four-season porch lies approximately 33 feet from the shoreline of Lake McCarrons or 42 feet into the required 75 foot setback; and WHEREAS, Section 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard and Lot Area Requirements in R-l Districts) requires a front yard (road side) setback of 30 feet, and a five foot side yard setback. The Sladky property lies on the north side of Lake McCarrons with a private drive from North McCarrons Boulevard and no public frontage on a road. The pre-existing, non-conforming setback from the west side of the property is 2.9 feet; and WHEREAS, the removal of the former porch was precipitated by water damage. The Sladkys were in the process of remodeling the four-season porch when they discovered extensive damage to the structural support joists ofthe roof and walls due to water and carpenter ants. It was determined the porch must be removed. WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the request on Wednesday, October 11,2000, and recommended approval (5-0) of the requested variances, subject to the following: 1. Whereas, the Planning Commission finds that a strict application of the City Code would work an unusual hardship on the applicant; and 2. Whereas, the hardship was not created by the applicant; and 2