Laserfiche WebLink
u <br />Planners <br />How�rd �ah(gren Associates � Incorpo�ated <br />MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: 20 January 1984 <br />T0: <br />ATTPJ : <br />FROM: <br />e Gravel��nd T <br />Minnesota 5:i403 <br />Ci�y Council, CITY OF ROSEVIL�,E <br />James Andre, City Manager <br />Hau�ard Dahlgren <br />� <br />�� Margolis Request for Special Use Permit for Property at the <br />Northwest Corner of Larpenteur Avenue and Galtier Street <br />77 <br />The City Council at its meeting of 19 December 1983, voted to adjourn the <br />hearing regarding the Margolis Special Use Permit request on the subject <br />property to 23 January so as to allow Mr. Margolis time to wark with the <br />City staff in clearing up ambiguities relating to the existing condition, <br />previous commitments, and proposed changes. Toward this objective, we have <br />met with Mr. Margolis and Terry Jacobs, one of <br />on January 4, 11, and 18, :1984. These meetings�resultedCine�hechitec�s, <br />of an Fxisting Site Usage Plan, a Pro Preparation <br />state��,Lnt of action agre�ment consistingeofsnineUsage Plan, and a written <br />drawings and the statement are attached for the Council's review.�� �hP�e <br />The Existing Site Usage Plan (prepared at our r.equest) illustrates some af <br />the principal problems and concerns: <br />1. Th� plan illustratFS the location af an employee parking area <br />outside of the scre�ened area to the north. This parking was <br />never authorized a�; a part af the ariginal permit� and was <br />supposed to occur ,inJide the screEn fenced area. <br />2. There are two stoxage semi-trailers parked outside the screen <br />fence area at the southwest carner of the site. These ��ere not <br />autl�orized in the original permit. <br />3. The screen parking area was constructed ten (10) feet high but <br />�herc is several feet of space under the fence not comp3.eted. <br />This produces a very strange appearance, particularly froc7 <br />Lar�enteur Avenue, and is contrary to the original agreement. <br />This fenced area was authorized ta be 180 fe�t by 120 teet ii7 width. <br />It is actually constructed ut 128 feet in width. We suggest this <br />is not a major concern. <br />r� <br />