pf_01470 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

0 � MENIORANDUM RE: Margolis Request � 20 January 1984 Page 2 4. The original proposed and approved perimeter fence was not completed at the southeast corner of this sit� where it czosses the drainage area. One of the neiqhbors made a point of this deletian at the Council hearinge 5. The chain link fence encompassing the east side of the property has been constructed as proposed, but the ivy vine planting originally proposed contiguous to the fence has not been ins•talled. 6. The topsoil storage area now located at the far northwest corner of the site was supposed to be located just north of the office sit�. The concern expressed by the neighbors here relates to the objectionable naise created by the clanging of dump tr.uck tailc�ates and the beepers that activate when the loading equi�ment backs up. Mr. Margolis �xplains that the reason they did not put it in the ori.ginally progosed location is tha� the seedlings from the cottonwood s�and just west of their property on the Ramsey County park property contaminate the topsoil stockpile and that is the reason they moved it further to the north. The noise problem relayed by ths neighbors was particularly objectionable in the early hours of the morning. The neighbors also objected to the noise created by the telephone call signal system which is now located in the vicinity of the hoop houses near the center of the tract on the west side. The solution to these problems ��s worked aut with Mr.. Margoli.s and �s indicated on the Proposed Site [7sage Plan and his agreement statement for the Council's consideration are as follows: 1. The parking �utside of the scree�� fence contiguous to Larpenteur ,Avenue will be removed and will occur insidP the screen fenc�d area as originally proposed. To accammodate space f�r this function, a wood chips pile now occupying a portion of the scr�ened �rea will be moved �o the west side of the �ite, jus� north of th� pl�st,ic hoop houses� The former parking area shou].d be seeded and maintained in a mannex similar to such requi,r�d yaxd areas in oth�r typical developmen�s in Roseville. 2. The two storage semi-trailers will be remAVed uPon completion of the 30 foot by 6 foot storage building proposed in the original speci.a]. use permit apglication, The starage building will be located a� shown �n the Proposed Site U�age Plan. The build,ing shall be loca�ed 30 feet from the west property line, and 60 ieet �ZOrth of the screen fence area. 3. The screen f�nce shall be completed at th� bottom with the �ame material as originally constructed on the south side conti,guous to Larpen��ur F�venue. The Council may wish to consider requiring that the screen fence be completed on �he bot�om on the east side as well if they feel that is i.mportant. It is likely, however.,